...
首页> 外文期刊>Urban Studies >Keeping financialisation under the radar: Brussels Airport, Macquarie Bank and the Belgian politics of privatised infrastructure
【24h】

Keeping financialisation under the radar: Brussels Airport, Macquarie Bank and the Belgian politics of privatised infrastructure

机译:保持金融化不受关注:布鲁塞尔机场,麦格理银行和比利时私有化基础设施的政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article explores the financialisation of Brussels Airport following the acquisition in 2004 of a majority stake by the Australian Macquarie Bank. Adopting a variegated capitalism perspective, we argue for a greater sensitivity to the mutually constitutive relation between durable institutional governance structures and financialised practices injected by global investors. The case of Brussels Airport presents an informative case to examine this relation, as Macquarie has had to continuously interact with the Belgian federal state in its different guises of contractor, co-owner and regulator to implement financialisation. While Macquarie indeed brought in risks that are structurally associated with profit making through financial means, the governance of these practices is shaped by the Belgian state's distinctive and pragmatic approach to infrastructure privatisation: the state enables these practices, but also contests them in case of a direct clash with its interests. Meanwhile, the regulatory environment marks the contradictory meeting point of two varieties of capitalism: while the light-handed regulatory framework is inspired by the UK's airport industry, the Belgian regulator does not possess similar abilities as a UK regulator, and resultantly, informal negotiations between the stakeholders are more influential in the airport's governance. The case of Brussels Airport shows that the state plays an active role in constituting global capitalism, yet also shapes how financialisation works out on the ground. To understand the tensions that mark the governance of financialised infrastructure, it is therefore imperative to be sensitive to the local, historical and political trajectories that underwrite the variegated outcomes of financialisation.
机译:本文探讨了2004年澳大利亚麦格理银行(Australian Macquarie Bank)收购了多数股权之后布鲁塞尔机场的金融化过程。我们采用多样化的资本主义观点,主张对持久的机构治理结构与全球投资者注入的金融化实践之间的相互构成关系更加敏感。布鲁塞尔机场案提供了一个有意义的案例来研究这种关系,因为麦格理必须以承包商,共同所有人和监管机构的不同身份与比利时联邦政府不断互动,以实现金融化。尽管麦格理确实通过金融手段带来了与获利在结构上相关的风险,但这些做法的治理取决于比利时政府对基础设施私有化的独特而务实的态度:国家支持这些做法,但在出现这种情况时也要抗衡这些做法。与它的利益直接冲突。同时,监管环境标志着两种资本主义矛盾的交汇点:宽松的监管框架受到英国机场行业的启发,而比利时监管机构却不具备与英国监管机构类似的能力,因此,利益相关者在机场治理方面更具影响力。布鲁塞尔机场的案例表明,国家在构成全球资本主义方面发挥着积极作用,同时也影响了金融化的实际效果。因此,要了解标志着金融化基础设施治理的紧张关系,必须对构成金融多样化结果的地方,历史和政治轨迹保持敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号