首页> 外文期刊>Urban Geography >Consulting as a threat to local democracy? Flexible management consultants, pacified citizens, and political tactics of strategic development in German cities
【24h】

Consulting as a threat to local democracy? Flexible management consultants, pacified citizens, and political tactics of strategic development in German cities

机译:咨询对地方民主构成威胁吗?灵活的管理顾问,安抚的市民以及德国城市发展战略的政治策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

These days, it is often claimed that democratic procedures are under threat. The detachment of policy decisions from political debates is partly a result of the increasing influence of non-elected organizations and experts. Following a conceptual discussion of the spatiality of democracy, this paper focuses on management consultants as constraint on collective political participation in urban development; namely on McKinsey and Roland Berger. (De-)democratization is assessed alongside processes of inclusion and exclusion of both topics and people from political decisions. Based on a comparison of strategy-making projects in six German cities, the findings reveal three different types of urban policymaking ranging between expert-led and participatory versions. Despite the differences, each of the projects relied on a notion of passive citizens, who primarily need to be gotten on board and who lack the power to make decisions. This paper exposes the political tactics involved in an expert-influenced curtailment of democratic procedures.
机译:如今,人们常常声称民主程序正受到威胁。政治决策与政策辩论脱节的部分原因是非选举组织和专家的影响力日益增强。在对民主的空间性进行概念性讨论之后,本文将重点放在管理顾问作为对城市发展中集体政治参与的约束。即麦肯锡和罗兰·贝格。 (非民主化)民主与主题和人们从政治决策中的包含和排除过程一起进行评估。根据对德国六个城市战略制定项目的比较,研究结果揭示了三种不同类型的城市决策,包括专家主导型和参与型。尽管存在差异,但每个项目都依赖于被动公民的概念,被动公民首先需要加入,并且缺乏决策权。本文揭露了受专家影响的削减民主程序的政治策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号