...
首页> 外文期刊>Urban forum >Searching for More Than Just a House? The Extent to Which Government Provided RDP Housing Compared to Self-help Housing Empower Poor Communities in South Africa
【24h】

Searching for More Than Just a House? The Extent to Which Government Provided RDP Housing Compared to Self-help Housing Empower Poor Communities in South Africa

机译:寻找的不仅仅是房屋?与自助住房相比,政府提供RDP住房的程度赋予了南非贫困社区以优势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

For the past 20 years, the government in South Africa provided low-income communities with RDP (subsidy) houses to improve their quality of life and the places in which they reside. These houses have, however, been criticised regarding their location, construction locality, user participation and overall sustainability, while self-help housing has been highlighted as a method to ensure greater community involvement and choice. This paper reports on a study to determine to which extent government provided RDP housing compared to self-help housing empower poor communities in South Africa. The study compared a RDP and a self-help (People's Housing Process) project in Botshabelo, a large settlement in the central parts of the country, by utilising a set of indicators and determinants of empowerment. The findings indicate that while some determinants lacked, others were equally evident in both projects. Yet, the self-help housing project allowed greater opportunities to the residents for participation, skills development, improved self-confidence and control over the final product (house). Consequently, it becomes important for planning and housing policies to also incorporate social development, in the form of community empowerment, into their desired outcomes.
机译:在过去的20年中,南非政府为低收入社区提供RDP(补贴)房屋,以改善他们的生活质量和居住地点。但是,这些房屋在位置,施工地点,用户参与和整体可持续性方面受到批评,而自助房屋则被强调为确保社区更多参与和选择的一种方法。本文报告了一项研究,旨在确定政府在多大程度上提供了RDP住房,而自助住房则为南非的贫困社区提供了力量。该研究通过利用一系列赋权指标和决定因素,比较了该国中部的一个大型定居点Botshabelo的RDP和一项自助(人民住房进程)项目。调查结果表明,尽管缺少一些决定因素,但在两个项目中同样明显。但是,自助住房项目为居民提供了更多参与,技能开发,增强自信心和对最终产品(房屋)的控制的机会。因此,对于规划和住房政策而言,也必须将以社区赋权为形式的社会发展纳入其预期成果,这一点很重要。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Urban forum》 |2019年第1期|97-113|共17页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Town and Regional Planning, University of Pretoria, Building 8, South Campus, Pretoria 0002, South Africa;

    Department of Town and Regional Planning, University of Pretoria, Building 8, South Campus, Pretoria 0002, South Africa;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号