首页> 外文期刊>Urban affairs review >THE CALCULUS OF COALITIONS: Cities, Suburbs, and the Metropolitan Agenda
【24h】

THE CALCULUS OF COALITIONS: Cities, Suburbs, and the Metropolitan Agenda

机译:联盟的计算:城市,郊区和大都会议程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Reductions in federal urban assistance and devolution have made cities increasingly reliant on their state governments at a time when cities have lost political strength in state legislatures. This article identifies three types of coalitions that historically supported cities: party-imposed coalitions, interest-based coalitions, and governor-brokered coalitions. It shows how institutional, demographic, and economic changes have made these legislative coalitions less reliable. The article then considers prospects for constructing new city-suburban legislative coalitions. It argues that institutional constraints have limited the scope of preferences expressed by city and suburban legislators. The article concludes that prospects for city-suburban coalitions will depend on new issue definitions, institutional rules, and organizations that help city and suburban legislators redefine their policy preferences.
机译:在城市失去州议会的政治实力之际,减少联邦城市援助和权力下放使得城市越来越依赖州政府。本文确定了历史上支持城市的三种类型的联盟:由党派组成的联盟,基于利益的联盟和由州长代理的联盟。它显示了体制,人口和经济变化如何使这些立法联盟变得不那么可靠。然后,文章考虑了构建新的城郊立法联盟的前景。它认为制度上的限制限制了城市和郊区立法者表达的偏好范围。文章得出的结论是,城郊联盟的前景将取决于新的问题定义,制度规则和帮助城市和郊区立法者重新定义其政策偏好的组织。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号