...
首页> 外文期刊>Urban affairs review >Voting on a NIMBY Facility: Proximity Cost of an 'Iconic' Stadium
【24h】

Voting on a NIMBY Facility: Proximity Cost of an 'Iconic' Stadium

机译:在NIMBY设施上投票:“ Iconic”体育场的邻近成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper provides a spatial analysis at precinct level of the 2001 referendum of the Allianz Arena, a professional soccer stadium in Munich in Germany. While at the city level voters clearly supported the sports arena, voters in proximity of the proposed site opposed the project. Voters in proximity of an alternative site instead supported the project. We conclude that residents expected net costs of proximity to stadia and engaged in the referendum in order to shift the stadium away from their neighborhood. These findings indicate that sport facilities may exhibit a NIMBY (Not In My Backyard) character, which stands in contrast to the evidence available for the United States. Proximity costs and benefits of sports facilities apparently vary across sports and countries.
机译:本文对2001年德国慕尼黑专业足球场安联球场的全民投票进行了空间分析。在城市一级,选民显然支持体育馆,而拟议选址附近的选民则反对该项目。替代站点附近的选民支持该项目。我们得出的结论是,居民期望体育场附近的净成本并参与全民投票,以使体育场远离他们的邻居。这些发现表明,体育设施可能具有NIMBY(不在我家后院)的特征,这与美国现有的证据相反。运动设施的邻近成本和收益显然在各个运动项目和国家/地区之间有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号