首页> 外文期刊>Urban affairs review >Limits of Property Taxes and Charges: City Revenue Structures After the Great Recession
【24h】

Limits of Property Taxes and Charges: City Revenue Structures After the Great Recession

机译:财产税的限额:经济大萧条后的城市收入结构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Public finance theories argue local governments should primarily use broad-based and stable property taxes. However, the housing bust after the Great Recession challenges this argument, and historical trends show cities have heavily relied on charges since the late 1970s. Using 2012 Census of Governments data for 2,396 cities, this article explores which cities rely more on charges and the links between property tax dependence and city stress. Regression results show property tax dependence is linked to capacity, while charges dependence is linked to stress. Charges can be a useful revenue tool for cities under stress, but they may be regressive and their use may be limited to urban places with services that can be charged for and cities with growth pressures and less stringent tax and expenditure limitations. Absent equalization efforts from higher-level governments, barriers to using charges, which cities have little control over, may increase inequality among cities.
机译:公共财政理论认为,地方政府应首先使用基础广泛且稳定的财产税。然而,大萧条后的房地产泡沫破裂挑战了这一论点,历史趋势表明,自1970年代末以来,城市一直严重依赖收费。本文使用2012年政府调查的2396个城市数据,探讨了哪些城市更多地依赖收费以及物业税依赖性和城市压力之间的联系。回归结果表明,财产税的依赖性与能力有关,而收费的依赖性与压力有关。收费对于处于压力下的城市可能是有用的收入工具,但收费可能是递减的,其使用范围可能仅限于可收​​费的城市地区以及增长压力大,税收和支出限制不那么严格的城市。上级政府缺乏均等化努力,使用收费的障碍(城市几乎无法控制)可能会加剧城市之间的不平等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号