...
首页> 外文期刊>Updates in Surgery >Multicentric GISCoR Study “Intensive clinical follow-up versus surgical radicalization after complete endoscopic polypectomy of a malignant adenoma” (SEC-GISCoR)
【24h】

Multicentric GISCoR Study “Intensive clinical follow-up versus surgical radicalization after complete endoscopic polypectomy of a malignant adenoma” (SEC-GISCoR)

机译:多中心GISCoR研究“在恶性腺瘤的完整内窥镜息肉切除术后进行深入的临床随访与手术根治”(SEC-GISCoR)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Colorectal cancer screening programs result in an early diagnosis of the disease. In 2007, 250 malignant polyps were identified in Lombardy, out of 1,329 screen-detected colorectal carcinomas. The Italian Group for Colorectal Cancer (GISCoR) promoted the multicentric study “Endoscopic Follow-up versus Surgical Radicalization of Malignant Polyps after Complete Endoscopic Polypectomy” (SEC-GISCoR). The protocol was a multicentric, prospective, observational, non-randomized study. It included patients diagnosed a colorectal malignant adenoma, after complete endoscopic removal. From November 2005 to September 2009, three participating centers enrolled 120 patients with malignant polyps after “complete” endoscopic polypectomy; malignant polyps were classified as “low risk” or “high risk”. The study had two arms: “Intensive follow-up” (42 patients: 32 with low-risk and 10 with high-risk polyps) and “Surgical radicalization” (78 patients: 5 with low-risk and 73 with high-risk polyps). Data were collected using an online CRF. Overall, 37/120 polyps (30.8%) were low risk and 83/120 (69.2%) were high risk. 42 out of 120 patients (35%) were enrolled in the “clinical follow-up” arm, while 78/120 (65%) entered the surgery arm. In 15 cases, patients were not enrolled in the correct arm, according to the criteria agreed upon before starting the study. There still is a high incidence (11.5%) of pathological mismatches. No clinical event was reported in 2.9 years of follow-up. In conclusion, some differences emerged in the management of patients with malignant polyps among participating centers (p < 0.001), mismatches can be explained by high surgical risk or patient’s choice. Only in 5 cases (4.2%), did data analysis not allow to exactly determine the reason for a choice different from protocol criteria. The availability of new risk factors and the evidence of pathological mismatches confirmed the need for future studies on this issue.
机译:大肠癌筛查程序可导致对该疾病的早期诊断。 2007年,在1​​,329例经筛查发现的大肠癌中,在伦巴第地区发现了250例恶性息肉。意大利结肠直肠癌小组(GISCoR)推动了多中心研究“完全内镜下息肉切除术后内镜随访与恶性息肉的外科手术根治”(SEC-GISCoR)。该方案是一项多中心,前瞻性,观察性,非随机研究。其中包括在完全内窥镜切除后被诊断为大肠恶性腺瘤的患者。从2005年11月至2009年9月,三个参与中心对120例“完全”内镜下息肉切除术后恶性息肉患者进行了研究。恶性息肉分为“低风险”或“高风险”。该研究有两个方面:“强化随访”(42例:低危32例,高危息肉10例)和“手术彻底”(78例:低危5例,高危息肉73例) )。使用在线CRF收集数据。总体而言,息肉为低风险的有37/120(30.8%),高风险为83/120(69.2%)。 120名患者中有42名(35%)参加了“临床随访”组,而78/120名患者(65%)进入了手术组。在开始研究之前,根据商定的标准,有15例患者未纳入正确的治疗组。病理失配的发生率仍然很高(11.5%)。在2.9年的随访中未报告任何临床事件。总之,参与中心之间的恶性息肉患者的治疗方法存在一些差异(p <0.001),错位可以通过高手术风险或患者的选择来解释。仅在5例(4.2%)中,数据分析无法准确确定选择不同于方案标准的原因。新的危险因素的提供和病理学错配的证据证实了对该问题进行进一步研究的必要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号