首页> 外文期刊>Trusts & Trustees >White v Jones: what if the claimant was not the client?
【24h】

White v Jones: what if the claimant was not the client?

机译:怀特诉琼斯(White v Jones):如果索赔人不是当事人,该怎么办?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article puts the decision of White v Jones under the microscope. It does so in three parts: First, it considers the case of White v Jones itself and attempts to make sense of the reasoning of the House of Lords. Second, it considers a number of difficulties that the courts have experienced in applying the decision of White v Jones in the context of its own facts, namely in relation to professional advice in the context of testamentary dispositions. Finally, it considers how far the decision in White v Jones actually goes, and looks at some of the cases that have considered the application of White v Jones outside the wills context.
机译:本文将“白诉琼斯案”的裁决置于显微镜下。它分为三个部分:第一,考虑怀特诉琼斯案本身,并试图弄清上议院的推理。其次,它考虑了法院在其自身事实的背景下,即在遗嘱处置背景下的专业咨询方面,在实施怀特诉琼斯案的判决时遇到的许多困难。最后,它考虑了怀特诉琼斯案中的判决实际上有多大的影响,并考察了一些在遗嘱范围之外考虑了怀特诉琼斯案的适用的案件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号