首页> 外文期刊>Trends in Organized Crime >Human trafficking and criminal investigation strategies in the Amsterdam Red Light District
【24h】

Human trafficking and criminal investigation strategies in the Amsterdam Red Light District

机译:阿姆斯特丹红灯区的人口贩运和刑事调查策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The subject of human trafficking has recently received a lot of attention from society and the world of politics. The criminal-law approach to human trafficking has also been placed high on the agenda of law enforcers. Human trafficking is, however, a complex crime with several specific characteristics. For example, there is often a complex relationship between victims and perpetrators of human trafficking and victims are often too afraid to file a report. How do the police and the judicial authorities work in the investigation of human trafficking in view of the specific characteristics of human trafficking? What choices are made in practice and what different police investigative strategies can be distinguished? What opportunities and risks are inherent in the choices made? In this article we answer these questions on the basis of four large scale police investigations into human trafficking that we studied closely. The four criminal cases all focused on violent groups of human traffickers that operated in the Amsterdam window prostitution. All criminal cases have since been concluded (in first instance). It turned out that in each of the four investigations the relevant police team applied a different investigative strategy: one investigation focused primarily on the victim statements, one investigation focused on public nuisance, one investigation focused on the evidence against the criminal organisation and one investigation focused on the offences (evidence concerning the exploitation of prostitutes). In this article we compare the four strategies applied and consider the consequences of each strategy for the course of the investigation and the criminal prosecution and what dilemma’s are faced in each strategy. Although the various investigations cannot be easily compared and a uniform ‘best’ strategy cannot be designated, the comparison does show that some choices or decisions entail great opportunities or great risks as regards the successful investigation and prosecution of human trafficking. It concerns, for example, the choice of involving local investigative services (district police) or the choice for short-term or, as the case may be, longer-running investigations.
机译:人口贩运这一主题最近受到社会和政治世界的广泛关注。贩运人口的刑法方法也已被置于执法人员的议事日程中。但是,人口贩运是一种复杂的犯罪,具有几个特定特征。例如,人口贩运活动的受害者与作案者之间通常存在复杂的关系,受害者常常太害怕提交报告。鉴于人口贩运的特殊特征,警察和司法当局如何开展人口贩运调查?在实践中做出了哪些选择,可以区分哪些不同的警察调查策略?选择所固有的机会和风险是什么?在本文中,我们根据我们仔细研究过的四次大规模的警察贩运人口调查,回答了这些问题。这四起刑事案件都针对在阿姆斯特丹窗口卖淫活动中从事暴力活动的人口贩子。此后,所有刑事案件均已结案(一审)。事实证明,在这四项调查中,相关警察团队均采用了不同的调查策略:一项调查主要针对受害者的陈述,一项调查针对公众的滋扰,一项调查针对针对犯罪组织的证据,另一项调查针对有关罪行(有关剥削妓女的证据)。在本文中,我们比较了所采用的四种策略,并考虑了每种策略在调查和刑事诉讼过程中的后果以及每种策略面临的困境。尽管无法轻松地比较各种调查,也无法指定统一的“最佳”策略,但比较确实表明,在成功调查和起诉人口贩运方面,某些选择或决定会带来巨大的机会或巨大的风险。例如,它涉及选择让当地调查服务机构参与调查(区警察),还是进行短期调查(或视情况而定)进行较长时间的调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号