首页> 外文期刊>Transportation >Transport effects of e-commerce: what can be learned after years of research?
【24h】

Transport effects of e-commerce: what can be learned after years of research?

机译:电子商务的运输影响:经过多年研究,可以学到什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper offers an extensive review of conceptual and quantitative studies on the implications of business-to-consumer (b2c) e-commerce on mobility. To create a more comprehensive understanding of the mobility implications we also discuss the complementary side: freight transport. Most studies conducted thus far have looked at the consequences of b2c e-commerce for either personal travel or goods movement, but not for both. The added value of this review article is that it not only explores the conclusions drawn in the wide-ranging published research, but also attempts to review the sampling strategies, definitions, assumptions and methodologies that lead to the diverse conclusions. For example, the paper discusses the differences in how "e-shopping" is defined (whether it includes browsing or only purchasing) and with what frequency a respondent e-shops (however it is defined) in order to be considered an "e-shopper". The review describes how product differentiation is necessary to scrutinize the mobility effects of e-commerce. It points to studies which tend to have a dual conclusion. We try to observe whether complementary effects are given the same level of attention as substitution effects. Each of these factors can have sizable impacts on the quantitative conclusions reached. Our aim is that, by calling attention to these issues, the conclusions of studies will be discussed in a rigorous way to improve our knowledge of the transportation impacts of online shopping.
机译:本文对企业对消费者(b2c)电子商务对移动性的影响进行了概念和定量研​​究的广泛综述。为了更全面地了解交通的含义,我们还讨论了补充方面:货运。到目前为止,进行的大多数研究都关注了B2c电子商务对个人旅行或货物运输的影响,但对两者均没有。这篇评论文章的附加价值在于,它不仅探讨了广泛发表的研究中得出的结论,而且还试图回顾导致各种结论的抽样策略,定义,假设和方法。例如,本文讨论了如何定义“电子购物”(无论是仅包含浏览还是仅包含购买)以及被调查者在哪个频率的电子商店(无论如何定义)之间的差异,以便将其视为“电子购物”。购物者”。该评论描述了如何差异化产品来审查电子商务的移动性影响。它指出了倾向于得出双重结论的研究。我们尝试观察互补效应是否具有与替代效应相同的关注度。这些因素中的每一个都会对得出的定量结论产生巨大影响。我们的目标是通过引起人们对这些问题的关注,以严格的方式讨论研究结论,以提高我们对在线购物的交通影响的认识。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transportation》 |2013年第5期|867-885|共19页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Geography and Environment, Bar Ilan University, 52900 Ramat Gan, Israel;

    Hogeschool van Amsterdam, University of Applied Science, P.O. Box 1025, 1000 BA Amsterdam,The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    b2c; c2c; Online retailing; E-shopping; Travel; Mobility;

    机译:b2c;c2c;在线零售;电子购物;旅行;流动性;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:18:53

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号