首页> 外文期刊>Transportation >Hailing a change: comparing taxi and ridehail service quality in Los Angeles
【24h】

Hailing a change: comparing taxi and ridehail service quality in Los Angeles

机译:欢呼变化:在洛杉矶比较出租车和乘车服务质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For decades, taxis have provided for-hire vehicle service without significant competition from other modes. But in 2012, ride-hail services such as Uber and Lyft upended the taxi business model by connecting riders to drivers through smartphone applications. Since then, few studies have considered how taxis compare to their new competition or how service quality varies across the two modes. We use data from 1680 ride-hail and taxi trips taken in a Los Angeles audit study to ask: how do service qualities-including trip price, reliability, and accountability-vary across ride-hailing (Uber and Lyft) and taxis? We find that, for the same origin and destination pair, ridehail users pay 40% lower fares and wait about one-quarter of the time compared to taxis. In addition, ride-hailing nearly guaranteed a ride, while about one in five taxi riders were never picked up. We utilize semi-structured interviews of frequent taxi and ride-hail users to examine potential explanations of the stark quantitative differences observed across modes. Findings reveal that, despite technological disruption, travelers continue to prioritize the long-standing tenets of transportation services: affordability, reliability, and accountability. Ride-hailing successfully implemented technologies to deliver on these traveler priorities, while taxis have largely failed to capitalize on new technologies. Findings suggest that taxis will need to do more than lower prices or put more cars on the road if they hope to compete with ride-hailing services, and that both new and old modes should harness technology to deliver on long-standing transportation service goals.
机译:几十年来,出租车为雇用车辆服务提供,无需其他模式的重要竞争。但是,在2012年,Uber和Lyft等乘车冰雹服务通过将骑手通过智能手机应用连接到驾驶员来增长出租车商业模式。从那时起,很少有研究考虑过出租车如何与新竞争对比或服务质量如何在这两种模式中变化。我们在洛杉矶审计学习中使用的1680名乘车和出租车旅行的数据询问:如何在乘车驾驶(优步和Lyft)和出租车上包括旅行价格,可靠性和责任 - 在包括旅行价格,可靠性和问责制我们发现,对于相同的起源和目的地对,Ridehail用户支付40%的票价,并与出租车相比等待四分之一的时间。此外,骑行骑行几乎保证骑行,而大约有五分之一的出租车从未接受过。我们利用频繁出租车的半结构化访谈和乘车用户来检查跨模式观察到的显着定量差异的潜在解释。调查结果表明,尽管技术中断,旅行者继续优先考虑运输服务的长期特权:负担能力,可靠性和问责制。乘车成功实施了在这些旅行者优先考虑的技术,而出租车在很大程度上未能利用新技术。调查结果表明,如果他们希望与乘车服务竞争,并且新的和旧模式都应该在路上竞争更多的汽车,并且应该在长期运输服务目标中提供更多的价格,以便在路上进行更多的价格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号