首页> 外文期刊>Transportation >Why (not) abolish fares? Exploring the global geography of fare-free public transport
【24h】

Why (not) abolish fares? Exploring the global geography of fare-free public transport

机译:为什么(不是)废除票价?探索免费公共交通的全球地理位置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although the policy of abolishing fares in public transport-here referred to as "fare-free public transport" (FFPT)-exists in nearly 100 localities worldwide, it has not been thoroughly researched. To start filling this gap, I enhance the conceptual clarity about fare abolition. I start by providing a definition of FFPT, discussing its different forms, and introducing a distinction between "partial" FFPT and-the main focus of the paper-"full" FFPT. Next, I distinguish three perspectives on full FFPT-first, approaches that assess fare abolition primarily against its economic impact; second, analyses that look at its contribution to "sustainable" development; third, more critical arguments highlighting its politically transformative and socially just potential. Against the background of this debate I offer the most comprehensive inventory of full FFPT programmes to date, and begin to chart and examine their global geography. As a result, FFPT emerges as a policy that takes diverse forms and exists in diverse locations. Supported and contested by diverse rationales, it cannot be analysed as transport instrument alone.
机译:虽然在公共交通工具中取消票价的政策 - 这里被称为“免费公共交通工具”(FFPT) - 在全球近100个地方的近100个地方,它尚未彻底研究。要开始填补这一差距,我提升了票价的概念清晰度。我首先提供FFPT的定义,讨论其不同的形式,并在“部分”FFPT和纸张的主要焦点之间进行了区分 - “全”FFPT。接下来,我将三个视角区分开了全面的FFPT-First,评估票价的方法主要针对其经济影响;其次,分析,了解其对“可持续”发展的贡献;第三,更关键的论据突出了其政治变革和社会的潜力。根据本次辩论的背景,我向迄今为止提供全面的FFPT计划库存,并开始图表并检查其全球地理学。因此,FFPT作为一种措施,作为一种不同形式的政策,并存在于不同的位置。通过不同的理由支持和竞争,不能单独分析为运输仪器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号