首页> 外文期刊>Transportation >Impact of different shopping stages on shopping-related travel behaviour: analyses of the Netherlands Mobility Panel data
【24h】

Impact of different shopping stages on shopping-related travel behaviour: analyses of the Netherlands Mobility Panel data

机译:不同购物阶段对购物相关旅行行为的影响:对荷兰出行专家组数据的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

From the moment e-shopping emerged, there have been speculations about its impact on personal mobility. A fair amount of research has already been carried out on Internet shopping itself as well as on its consequences for mobility. Most studies focus on the overall impact of online shopping on personal mobility. However, little is known about how personal shopping mobility can be characterised when differentiating its constituent stages, being browsing/orienting, comparing, selecting and purchasing products, and how this is affected by e-shopping. This will be the main topic of this paper. We will investigate this using recently collected data from the Netherlands Mobility Panel [in Dutch: MobiliteitsPanel Nederland (MPN)]. It is the unique combination of reported shopping trips in the three-day travel diary, the large amount of personal and household characteristics combined with the detailed information from the e-shopping questionnaire that enables us to perform this research. Using factor analysis, we explore the underlying factors related to the browsing and selection behaviour prior to the purchase of a product. Using these factors as a starting point, we apply cluster analysis resulting in three homogeneous groups of shoppers with different pre-purchase shopping behaviour. The groups differ clearly with respect to personal and household characteristics, in the frequency with which they buy and sell products online and in their perception of (dis-)advantages of online shopping. Once relevant groups have been distinguished and characterised, differences in shopping-related mobility between them are studied in two different ways. Firstly, we analyse statements from shoppers on how their shopping-related mobility has changed. Secondly, we analyse shopping trips reported in the three-day travel diary. Only one group, which consists of shoppers that rely on the Internet to search for product information, compare prices and get new product ideas, states that their shopping-related travel behaviour has changed since they started shopping online. Approximately 50% of all shoppers experienced no difference in their shopping mobility. The analysis of actual shopping mobility using the travel diary data showed only minor differences in shopping-related travel behaviour between the identified groups. Finally, we fit a multi-variate linear regression model of shopping trip distance to determine if (e)-shopping characteristics influence trip distances. The frequency with which people shop online as well as some stated changes in shopping-related travel behaviour (shopping in a similar manner and shopping longer) turn out to influence non-grocery shopping trip distance. No significant influence could be found of shopping cluster membership on shopping trip distances.
机译:从出现电子购物的那一刻起,就一直有人猜测它对个人出行的影响。已经对互联网购物本身及其对移动性的影响进行了大量研究。大多数研究关注在线购物对个人出行的总体影响。但是,对于区分个人购物移动性的组成阶段,浏览/定向,比较,选择和购买产品以及如何受到电子购物的影响,如何表征个人购物移动性知之甚少。这将是本文的主题。我们将使用荷兰交通专家组最近收集的数据进行调查[荷兰语:MobiliteitsPanel Nederland(MPN)]。这是三天旅行日记中报告的购物旅行的独特组合,大量的个人和家庭特征以及来自电子购物调查表的详细信息,使我们能够进行这项研究。使用因素分析,我们在购买产品之前探索了与浏览和选择行为有关的潜在因素。以这些因素为起点,我们进行聚类分析,得出三组具有相同的预购购物行为的购物者。这些群体在个人和家庭特征,在线购买和销售产品的频率以及对在线购物(不利)优势的认识方面存在明显差异。一旦对相关群体进行了区分和表征,便可以通过两种不同的方式研究他们之间购物相关流动性的差异。首先,我们分析购物者关于购物相关流动性如何变化的陈述。其次,我们分析了三天旅行日记中报告的购物旅行。只有一组由依赖互联网来搜索产品信息,比较价格并获得新产品创意的购物者组成,他们说,自从他们开始在线购物以来,与购物有关的旅行行为已经改变。大约50%的购物者的购物移动性没有差异。使用旅行日记数据对实际购物流动性的分析表明,在所确定的群体之间,与购物相关的旅行行为只有很小的差异。最后,我们拟合购物行程距离的多元线性回归模型,以确定(e)购物特征是否影响行程距离。人们网购的频率以及与购物相关的出行行为的某些规定的变化(以类似方式购物且购物时间更长)被证明会影响非食品购物距离。没有发现购物集群成员资格对购物旅行距离有重大影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号