首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research Part B: Methodological >A comparison of three idling options in long-haul truck scheduling
【24h】

A comparison of three idling options in long-haul truck scheduling

机译:远程卡车调度中三种怠速选择的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper studies the Truck Driver Scheduling Problem with Idling Options (TDSP-IO), an extension of the long-haul truck driver scheduling problem with a more comprehensive objective function that accounts for driving cost, fuel cost, and idling cost. The best-known idling option is the widespread practice of keeping the vehicle engine running while the vehicle is not moving, which primarily stems from the drivers'desire to keep their vehicle at an adequate comfort level during breaks. Here, we explore two additional cleaner idling options: resting at an Electrified Parking Space (EPS) or using an Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) while idling. We also account for the initial investments associated with the equipment required for the use of these technologies. We formulate a mathematical model for the TDSP-IO under these three idling options, and we perform extensive computational experiments on realistic benchmark instances. The paper sheds light on the trade-offs between various performance indicators and offers several managerial and policy insights. Our analyses quantify the advantages of using EPSs and APUs, and show that they yield both economical and environmental benefits. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文研究了带空转选项的卡车驾驶员调度问题(TDSP-IO),它是对长途卡车驾驶员调度问题的扩展,具有更全面的目标函数,该函数考虑了行驶成本,燃料成本和空转成本。最著名的怠速选择是在车辆不行驶时保持车辆发动机运转的普遍做法,这主要源于驾驶员在休息期间希望将车辆保持在足够舒适度的愿望。在这里,我们探索了两个更清洁的空转选项:空转时停在电动停车位(EPS)或使用辅助动力装置(APU)。我们还考虑了与使用这些技术所需的设备相关的初始投资。我们在这三个空闲选项下为TDSP-IO制定了数学模型,并在现实的基准实例上进行了广泛的计算实验。本文阐明了各种绩效指标之间的取舍,并提供了一些管理和政策方面的见解。我们的分析量化了使用EPS和APU的优势,并表明它们产生了经济和环境效益。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号