...
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation research >Active transport, public transport and electric car as perceived alternatives in a motorized Norwegian sample
【24h】

Active transport, public transport and electric car as perceived alternatives in a motorized Norwegian sample

机译:主动运输,公共运输和电动汽车是挪威机动化样本中的替代产品

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Research regarding perceptions of mode alternatives to a motorized car may yield essential information about the modes that people are likely to use if they reduce their motorized car use. These perceptions are likely to be associated with demographics, spatial factors and psychological variables. The current study aims to investigate the relative role of such factors for perceived transport alternatives to a motorized car in an urban motorized Norwegian sample. The study is based on a survey conducted in a random representative sample of individuals with car access (n = 878) residing in the six largest urban areas in Norway. The results reflected that demographics, spatial and psychological factors relate to perceived mode alternatives and their relative role seems to differ according to the mode alternatives in question. Low income, basic education and low annual mileage were related to a high probability of considering public transport as an alternative to motorized car use. Individuals who did not perceive public transport mode use as a sign of low social status and had a weak self-determination to use a motorized car also had higher probability of considering public transport. Priorities of flexibility reduced the likelihood of considering public transport as an alternative to motorized car use. Practical barriers, such as travel distance and weather conditions, were associated with a low probability of considering active transport (i.e. walking and bicycling). Priorities of flexibility were also related to a low probability of considering active transport. Low annual mileage, less self-determination regarding car use and pro-environmental attitudes were associated with flexible considerations of mode alternatives. Mode shift interventions need to take demographic, spatial as well as psychological factors into consideration. The interventions may improve the effectiveness when they are differentiated according to the specific transport modes that they aim to promote. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:有关对机动车替代方案的看法的研究可能会得出有关人们减少机动车使用量可能使用的模式的基本信息。这些看法可能与人口统计学,空间因素和心理变量有关。当前的研究旨在调查在城市化的挪威样本中,这些因素对于感知到的汽车替代运输方式的相对作用。该研究基于对挪威六个最大城市地区的有汽车通行证的个人(n = 878)进行的随机代表性抽样调查。结果表明,人口统计学,空间和心理因素与感知的模式选择有关,并且它们的相对作用似乎根据所讨论的模式选择而有所不同。低收入,基础教育和较低的年行驶里程与考虑将公共交通替代机动车辆使用的可能性较高有关。没有将公共交通工具的使用视为社会地位低下的标志,对使用机动车辆的自决能力较弱的人也有较高的可能性考虑使用公共交通工具。灵活性的优先考虑降低了考虑将公共交通替代机动车辆使用的可能性。诸如旅行距离和天气条件等实际障碍与考虑主动运输(即步行和骑自行车)的可能性较低有关。灵活性的优先考虑还与考虑主动运输的可能性低有关。年行驶里程低,对汽车使用的自主性和对环境的态度较少,这与灵活选择模式有关。模式转换干预措施需要考虑人口,空间和心理因素。当干预措施根据其旨在促进的特定运输方式而有所不同时,它们可能会提高有效性。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号