首页> 外文期刊>Transportation research >Demand-driven timetable design for metro services
【24h】

Demand-driven timetable design for metro services

机译:需求驱动的地铁服务时间表设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Timetable design is crucial to the metro service reliability. A straightforward and commonly adopted strategy in daily operation is a peak/off-peak-based schedule. However, such a strategy may fail to meet dynamic temporal passenger demand, resulting in long passenger waiting time at platforms and over-crowding in trains. Thanks to the emergence of smart card-based automated fare collection systems, we can now better quantify spatial-temporal demand on a microscopic level. In this paper, we formulate three optimization models to design demand-sensitive timetables by demonstrating train operation using equivalent time (interval). The first model aims at making the timetable more dynamic; the second model is an extension allowing for capacity constraints. The third model aims at designing a capacitated demand-sensitive peak/off-peak timetable. We assessed the performance of these three models and conducted sensitivity analyzes on different parameters on a metro line in Singapore, finding that dynamical timetable built with capacity constraints is most advantageous. Finally, we conclude our study and discuss the implications of the three models: the capacitated model provides a timetable which shows best performance under fixed capacity constraints, while the uncapacitated model may offer optimal temporal train configuration. Although we imposed capacity constraints when designing the optimal peak/off-peak timetable, its performance is not as good as models with dynamical headways. However, it shows advantages such as being easier to operate and more understandable to the passengers.
机译:时间表设计对于地铁服务的可靠性至关重要。在日常操作中,一种简单而普遍采用的策略是基于高峰/非高峰时间的计划。但是,这样的策略可能无法满足动态的临时乘客需求,从而导致站台上的乘客等待时间长,并且火车过于拥挤。由于基于智能卡的自动票价收集系统的出现,我们现在可以在微观水平上更好地量化时空需求。在本文中,我们通过演示使用等效时间(间隔)的列车运行,制定了三种优化模型来设计需求敏感的时间表。第一个模型旨在使时间表更具动态性。第二种模型是允许容量限制的扩展。第三个模型旨在设计一个容量敏感的需求敏感的高峰/非高峰时刻表。我们评估了这三种模型的性能,并在新加坡的地铁线路上对不同参数进行了敏感性分析,发现在有容量限制的情况下建立动态时间表是最有利的。最后,我们结束研究并讨论这三种模型的含义:容量模型提供了一个时间表,该时间表显示了在固定容量约束下的最佳性能,而容量模型则可以提供最佳的时空列车配置。尽管我们在设计最佳高峰/非高峰时刻时间表时强加了容量限制,但其性能不如带有动态车距的模型好。但是,它显示出诸如易于操作和乘客更容易理解的优点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transportation research》 |2014年第9期|284-299|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Future Cities Laboratory, Singapore-ETH Centre, Singapore 138602, Singapore,Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, Singapore;

    School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China;

    Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, Singapore,Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Blk E1A #07-16, 1 Engineering Drive 2, Singapore 117576, Singapore;

    Future Cities Laboratory, Singapore-ETH Centre, Singapore 138602, Singapore,Institute for Transport Planning and Systems (IVT), ETH Zuerich, Zuerich CH 8093, Switzerland;

    Future Cities Laboratory, Singapore-ETH Centre, Singapore 138602, Singapore;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Metro system; Timetable; Smart card; Demand-driven;

    机译:地铁系统;时间表;智能卡;需求驱动;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号