首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >The costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: Sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil
【24h】

The costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: Sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil

机译:减硫措施的成本和收益:硫磺洗涤塔与船用瓦斯油的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper examines the costs and benefits of reduction measures for the shipping industry to comply with the forthcoming sulphur emission regulations. Sulphur scrubbers and marine gas oil are two promising alternatives for ship owners. However, their economic comparisons are primarily based on a private perspective. This paper provides a wider viewpoint by integrating the private abatement costs of ship owners and the social environmental benefits from emission reduction. The results showed that the price spread between marine gas oil and heavy fuel oil is a determining factor in making this choice. Marine gas oil tends to have higher net present values than scrubbers when the price spread of fuel is less than 231 Euros per tonne. Furthermore, it is more beneficial to install a scrubber on new ships than retrofits. An old ship is not suitable for a scrubber installation when its remaining lifespan is less than 4 years.
机译:本文研究了减少航运措施以符合即将颁布的硫排放法规的成本和收益。硫磺洗涤塔和船用瓦斯油是船东的两个有前途的替代品。但是,它们的经济比较主要是基于私人角度。通过整合船东的私人减排成本和减排带来的社会环境收益,本文提供了更广阔的视野。结果表明,船用瓦斯油和重质燃料油之间的价差是做出此选择的决定性因素。当燃料的价差小于每吨231欧元时,船用瓦斯油的净现值往往比洗涤器要高。此外,在新船上安装洗涤塔比进行改造更有利。如果一艘旧船的剩余寿命少于4年,则不适合安装洗涤塔。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号