首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research. Part A, Policy and Practice >A monopolistic market for advanced traveller information systems and road use efficiency
【24h】

A monopolistic market for advanced traveller information systems and road use efficiency

机译:先进旅行者信息系统和道路使用效率的垄断市场

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Advanced traveller information systems (ATIS) are likely to exhibit significant economies of scale in production and operation. Private provision would therefore typically occur under considerable market power. An important policy question is whether the resulting distortions would aggravate or reduce distortions in the transport market itself, notably external effects such as congestion. We consider such questions by presenting an integrated model that captures the interactions between a congested transport market and a monopolistic market for advanced traveller information systems (ATIS). Three market failures operate simultaneously: congestion on the road, a declining average benefit of information when information penetration rises, and monopolistic pricing by the provider of information. Some key results are as follows. Monopoly information pricing appears not to be the most attractive option from a system efficiency viewpoint. A subsidy in the information market can help realise a second-best optimum of road use. Relatively low uncertainty on the road and high information costs limit the monopolist's profit on the information market, as well as relative system efficiency. While relatively inelastic demand for mobility, counter intuitively, negatively affects the monopolist's profit, the relative social benefits from private information peak at intermediate demand elasticities.
机译:先进的旅行者信息系统(ATIS)可能会在生产和运营中展现出巨大的规模经济。因此,私人提供通常会在相当大的市场力量下发生。一个重要的政策问题是,由此产生的扭曲是否会加剧或减少运输市场本身的扭曲,特别是诸如拥堵之类的外部影响。我们通过提出一个集成模型来考虑这些问题,该模型可以捕获交通拥挤的市场和高级旅行者信息系统(ATIS)的垄断市场之间的相互作用。三个市场失灵是同时发生的:道路拥堵,信息渗透率上升时信息的平均收益下降,信息提供商的垄断定价。一些主要结果如下。从系统效率的角度来看,垄断信息定价似乎不是最有吸引力的选择。信息市场的补贴可以帮助实现道路使用的次优优化。相对较低的道路不确定性和较高的信息成本限制了垄断者在信息市场上的利润以及相对的系统效率。尽管相对缺乏弹性的流动性需求(从直觉上反驳了)对垄断者的利润产生了负面影响,但私人信息带来的相对社会收益在中间需求弹性时达到顶峰。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号