首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Efficiency measurement in public transport: Are findings specification sensitive?
【24h】

Efficiency measurement in public transport: Are findings specification sensitive?

机译:公共交通效率衡量:发现规范敏感吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The need to measure transit system performance along with its various dimensions such as efficiency and effectiveness has led to the development of a wide array of approaches and vast literature. However, depending upon the specific approach used to examine performance, different conclusions are oftentimes reached. Using data from 15 European transit systems for a ten year time period (1990-2000), this paper discusses three important transit performance questions; (ⅰ) Do different efficiency assessment methodologies produce similar results? (ⅱ) How are the two basic dimensions of transit performance, namely efficiency and effectiveness, related? and (ⅲ) Are findings regarding organizational regimes (public operations, contracting and so on) sensitive to the methodological specifications employed? Results clearly indicate that efficiency scores and associated recommendations are sensitive to the models used, while efficiency and effectiveness are - albeit weakly -negatively related; these two findings can have far reaching policy implications.
机译:衡量运输系统性能及其各种方面(例如效率和有效性)的需求导致了各种各样的方法和大量文献的发展。但是,根据用于检查性能的特定方法,通常会得出不同的结论。本文使用十年期间(1990-2000年)的15个欧洲公交系统的数据,讨论了三个重要的公交性能问题。 (ⅰ)不同的效率评估方法会产生相似的结果吗? (ⅱ)过境绩效的两个基本方面,即效率和效力如何相关? (ⅲ)有关组织制度(公共运营,合同签订等)的发现是否对所采用的方法学规范敏感?结果清楚地表明,效率得分和相关建议对所使用的模型敏感,而效率和有效性之间(尽管微弱)负相关;这两个发现可能具有深远的政策含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号