...
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation research >Heterogeneity in the effectiveness of cooperative crossing collision prevention systems
【24h】

Heterogeneity in the effectiveness of cooperative crossing collision prevention systems

机译:协作式交叉防撞系统有效性的异质性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The adoption of a vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) cooperative crossing collision prevention system (CCPS) has been recognized as an option for reducing accident risk at intersections. However, the effects of driver characteristics on the general design of CCPSs have remained relatively unexamined. This study was conducted based on a field operational test (FOT) conducted in 2014 that included 64 monitored drivers receiving input from a CCPS and a driving style questionnaire (DSQ) that was administered to all 64 monitored drivers. To provide a better understanding of the various reactions of each driver with different driving styles, we employed both a logistic regression model and a time-series cross-sectional Prais-Winsten regression model with panel corrected standard errors (PCSEs). The impacts of the driver characteristics and driving styles on a surrogate safety measure, namely, time-to-collision (TTC) risk, were modeled. The results revealed that both CCPS information displays and alarms significantly affect the TTC, whereas limited differences were observed when the serial correlations were removed during the FOT. For drivers younger than 65, only drivers who exhibited a natural worrier driving style (one of the eight DSQ classifications) did not benefit from the CCPS; thus, safety at intersections can be improved in practice with a higher CCPS penetration ratio. However, the evaluated CCPS had a limited effect on elderly drivers due to the significant negative effects of most driving styles on the TTC risk; thus, CCPSs should be specifically designed for elderly drivers with various driving styles.
机译:车辆到基础设施(V2I)协作式交叉防撞系统(CCPS)的采用已被认为是减少交叉口事故风险的一种选择。但是,驾驶员特性对CCPS总体设计的影响尚未得到相对研究。这项研究是基于2014年进行的现场操作测试(FOT)进行的,该测试包括64位受监控的驾驶员从CCPS接收输入,以及对所有64位受监控的驾驶员进行的驾驶方式问卷(DSQ)。为了更好地理解每个驾驶员使用不同驾驶方式的各种反应,我们采用了逻辑回归模型和时间序列横截面Prais-Winsten回归模型,并采用了面板校正的标准误差(PCSE)。对驾驶员特征和驾驶方式对替代安全措施(即碰撞时间(TTC)风险)的影响进行了建模。结果表明,CCPS信息显示和警报都会显着影响TTC,而在FOT期间删除串行相关性时,观察到的差异有限。对于65岁以下的驾驶员,只有表现出自然忧虑驾驶风格(八个DSQ分类之一)的驾驶员才不会从CCPS中受益;因此,在实践中可以通过更高的CCPS渗透率来提高交叉路口的安全性。然而,由于大多数驾驶方式对TTC风险的显着负面影响,评估的CCPS对老年驾驶员的影响有限;因此,CCPS应该专门为具有各种驾驶风格的老年驾驶员而设计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号