首页> 外文期刊>Transportation research >Effect of multiple traffic information sources on route choice: A driving simulator study
【24h】

Effect of multiple traffic information sources on route choice: A driving simulator study

机译:多个交通信息源对路线选择的影响:驾驶模拟器研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With the arrival of new technologies more en-route traffic information sources have become available, especially in-car information sources. The aim of this study is to gain more insight into the effect of multiple, and possibly conflicting, sources of information on route choice and driver behaviour. In a driving simulator experiment, participants were required to make multiple drives, each of which ended with a choice between the normal and an alternative route. On each trial participants received traffic information from a Variable Message Sign (VMS), i.e. a dynamic sign above the road providing descriptive traffic information in the form of expected travel times (ETTs), a navigation device providing in-car prescriptive route advice, or information from both sources. In the latter type of trial the information could be congruent or conflicting with regards to ETTs on the VMS and advise from the navigation. After each trial, participants indicated how much trust they had in the traffic information and their primary information source. A Bayesian model was used to quantify the propensity to switch to the alternative route. Results indicate that overall compliance was very high for the primary source even when the other source did not corroborate this information and that most participants preferred to use the information from a VMS. However, when both the VMS and the navigation device provided information and the VMS indicated the same ETTs for the normal and alternative route, route choice was influenced by the advice provided by the navigation device. Also, in this type of trial mean speed was significantly lower compared to trials in which the two sources were in conflict, indicating increased mental workload, most likely due to attentional dissonance: a situation in which stimuli compete for attention resulting in cognitive conflict and the need to inhibit non-relevant information. A deeper understanding of how drivers use multiple traffic information sources and cope with irrelevant information could support driver safety and comfort, increase the usability of information sources, and help reduce stress, anxiety, and information overload while driving.
机译:随着新技术更多的航路交通信息来源已经变得可用,尤其是车载信息源的到来。这项研究的目的是为了更深入地了解多的效果,并且可能相互冲突的,信息来源的路径选择和驾驶员行为。在一个驾驶模拟器的实验中,被要求参加者使多个驱动器,其中的每一个与所述正常和替代路线之间的选择结束。上从一个可变信息注册(VMS),即动态标志的道路提供在预期行程时间(气管内导管)的形式描述的交通信息上述各接收到的试验参与者的交通信息,导航装置提供的车载规定路线的建议,或这两个来源的信息。在后一种类型的试验中的信息可以是全等或与来自导航问候的ETT对VMS和提醒冲突。每次试验后,与会者表示他们有多么信任曾在交通信息和他们的主要信息源。贝叶斯模型来的倾向开关量化到替代路线。结果表明,整体达标是非常高的主要来源,即使在其他消息人士没有证实这一信息,并最好使用从VMS的信息,大多数的参与者。然而,当两个VMS和导航装置提供的信息和指示VMS用于正常和替代路线相同的气管导管,路径选择是通过由导航装置提供的建议的影响。此外,在这种类型的试验平均速度为显著比较试验,其中两个来源是冲突的,表明增加心理负荷,很可能是由于注意力失调降低:其中产生认知冲突和注意事项刺激竞争的情况需要抑制非相关信息。司机如何使用多个交通信息来源和不相关的信息处理可以支持驾驶员的安全性和舒适性更深入的了解,增加信息来源的可用性,并帮助减轻压力,焦虑和信息过载而驾驶。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号