首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Seaport investments in capacity and natural disaster prevention
【24h】

Seaport investments in capacity and natural disaster prevention

机译:海港投资能力和自然灾害预防

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Most seaports face constraints in financial resources to some degree, and thus need to balance the investments in capacity and natural disaster prevention. On the one hand, due to budget constraint, limited resources need to be allocated between the two tasks. On the other hand, the benefit of natural disaster prevention investment is likely to be higher for ports with larger capacity. This study builds a stylized analytical model to examine the managerial and policy implications of such interactions between the two counteracting mechanisms. We find that the port managers would always prioritize capacity investment over natural disaster prevention investment. Social welfare maximizing ports invest more in both capacity and disaster prevention than those chosen by profit maximizing operators. However, compared with profit maximizing ports, welfare maximizing ports also require a larger budget to justify the investment in disaster prevention. Moreover, with increasing intensity of natural disaster, a port's capacity investment decreases and its disaster prevention investment increases, irrespective of its objective. The magnitudes of both changes are larger for welfare maximizing ports than for profit maximizing ports.
机译:大多数海港在一定程度上造成金融资源的限制,因此需要平衡对能力和自然防灾的投资。一方面,由于预算约束,需要在两个任务之间分配有限的资源。另一方面,对于具有较大容量的港口,自然防灾投资的益处可能会更高。本研究建立了一种程式化的分析模型,以检查两种抵消机制之间这种相互作用的管理和政策影响。我们发现港口经理始终优先考虑对自然防灾投资的能力投资。最大化港口的社会福利在能力和防灾方面投入更多,而不是利润最大化运营商选择的侵害。然而,与利润最大化港口相比,福利最大化港口还需要更大的预算,以证明防灾投资。此外,随着自然灾害强度的增加,港口的能力投资减少,无论其目标如何,灾害预防投资都会增加。对于福利最大化港口而言,这两个变化的大小比利润最大化端口更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号