首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research >Two methods of estimating long-distance driving to understand range restrictions on EV use
【24h】

Two methods of estimating long-distance driving to understand range restrictions on EV use

机译:估算远程驾驶的两种方法以了解电动汽车使用的行驶距离限制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The distances travelled by individual cars vary strongly from day to day. This is problematic for electric vehicles since they cannot be used for journeys longer than the all-electric range. At present, long-distance travel is rarely covered by household travel surveys and little is known about the frequency of long-distance car travel on an individual car basis. Here, two methods are compared that estimate the number of days per year with a driving distance larger than a given threshold: a simulation method and a probabilistic method. The simulation method combines a national household travel survey, a car-use survey and a long-distance travel survey and simulates one year of car driving; the resolution of results is car trips over a full year. The probabilistic method uses statistical distribution to estimate the number of days per year with long-distance travel. Both methods are tested on a representative one-week sample of the German Mobility Panel with travel data from over 6000 cars. Our results show that both methods produce similar aggregated results for the distribution of days with long-distance car travel, the maximum mileages, and average long-distance travel frequencies amongst user groups. However, the two methods differ on the level of individual cars. Our findings indicate that long-distance travel behaviour can be estimated on an aggregated level without long observation period data. Both methods can be directly applied to the limited range of electric vehicles and the need for adaptation or fast charging.
机译:各个汽车每天行驶的距离差异很大。这对于电动车辆是有问题的,因为它们不能用于比全电动范围更长的行程。目前,家庭旅行调查很少涉及长途旅行,而对长途汽车旅行的频率了解甚少。在这里,比较了两种方法来估算每年行驶距离大于给定阈值的天数:一种模拟方法和一种概率方法。模拟方法结合了全国家庭旅行调查,汽车使用调查和长途旅行调查,并模拟了一年的汽车驾驶;结果的解析度是整整一年的汽车旅行。概率方法使用统计分布来估计每年长途旅行的天数。两种方法均在具有代表性的为期一周的德国机动性专家小组样本中进行了测试,并使用了6000余辆汽车的行驶数据。我们的结果表明,对于用户群体中长途汽车出行的天数分布,最大里程和平均长途出行频率,这两种方法得出的汇总结果相似。但是,两种方法在单个汽车的级别上有所不同。我们的发现表明,无需长时间的观察期数据,就可以在汇总水平上估计长途旅行行为。两种方法都可以直接应用于电动汽车的有限范围以及适应性或快速充电的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号