首页> 外文期刊>Transportation research >Modeling EV charging choice considering risk attitudes and attribute non-attendance
【24h】

Modeling EV charging choice considering risk attitudes and attribute non-attendance

机译:考虑风险态度和属性不参与的电动汽车充电选择建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, we developed and compared logit based models of Chinese electric vehicle (EV) drivers' charging choice behaviors in terms of whether or not to charge at a destination with a charging facility. First, we conducted a web-based stated preference survey to obtain EV drivers' charging choice data and EV-related risk attitudes. Using these data we developed EV drivers charging choice models based on hybrid choice modeling (HCM) framework, incorporating risk attitude and different decision strategies. The HCM binary logit model results indicate that the risk attitude variable is a significant predictor of EV drivers' charging choices. Comparing the two HCM latent class logit (LCL) models, the attribute non-attendance (ANA) LCL model gets a better goodness-of-fit over the fully compensatory LCL model. The ANA LCL model result shows that the EV drivers are divided into two classes: risk averse class focuses primarily on the amount of excess or buffer range they have available to complete their next trip; and risk seeking class balances price against their current state of charge. This paper provides more insights into charging behavior and can be used to estimate the charging demand.
机译:在本文中,我们开发并比较了基于logit的中国电动汽车(EV)驾驶员充电选择行为的模型,该模型涉及是否在带有充电设施的目的地充电。首先,我们进行了基于网络的陈述偏好调查,以获取电动汽车驾驶员的充电选择数据和与电动汽车相关的风险态度。利用这些数据,我们基于混合选择模型(HCM)框架开发了电动汽车驾驶员充电选择模型,并结合了风险态度和不同的决策策略。 HCM二进制logit模型结果表明,风险态度变量是EV驾驶员充电选择的重要预测指标。通过比较两个HCM潜在类对数(LCL)模型,属性无人参与(ANA)LCL模型比完全补偿LCL模型具有更好的拟合优度。 ANA LCL模型的结果表明,EV驱动程序分为两类:风险规避类主要集中在他们有能力完成下一次行程的超额或缓冲范围内;寻求风险的阶层会根据其当前的收费状态来平衡价格。本文提供了有关充电行为的更多见解,并可用于估计充电需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号