首页> 外文期刊>Transportation research >Running on empty - Users' charging behavior of electric vehicles versus traditional refueling
【24h】

Running on empty - Users' charging behavior of electric vehicles versus traditional refueling

机译:空载行驶-电动车用户的充电行为与传统加油相比

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The demand-oriented establishment of a charging infrastructure is crucial for the deep market penetration of electric vehicles. In order to identify specific optimal locations for charging stations, a deeper understanding of the users' charging behavior is required. For reliable simulations and forecasts, it is not only necessary to take the charging behavior of the current early-adopter group into account, but also to compare it with the current refueling behavior of those, who could switch to electric vehicles in the near and medium-term future. The study follows a two-stage research approach. First of all, qualitative interviews (N = 24) were conducted to identify refueling behavior in terms of behavioral patterns, refueling motives and conditions. The second step involves a quantitative comparison of the refueling and charging behavior with regard to conditions, frequencies and critical levels. A large-scale questionnaire study (N = 1021) with car drivers from Germany was carried out for this purpose. The results showed that the conditions for a refueling or charging decision only differ partially. While financial aspects play a minor role for e-vehicle users, for internal combustion engine users planning and habit are less important. There is no difference between the two groups regarding range-relevant factors. In particular, the filling level perceived as critical is identical for fuel tanks and batteries. In terms of behavior patterns, e-vehicle users tend to charge consumed quantities in a timely manner, while users of vehicles with combustion engines often run on empty and then refill the tank completely. Only a few predictors for both behaviors could be identified. While socio-demographic factors hardly play a role, socio-economy and vehicle utilization are the biggest predictors. The results are incorporated into the modeling of potential users when planning new charging infrastructure. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:以需求为导向的充电基础设施的建立对于电动汽车深入市场渗透至关重要。为了确定充电站的特定最佳位置,需要对用户的充电行为有更深入的了解。为了获得可靠的模拟和预测,不仅需要考虑当前早期采用者组的充电行为,而且还需要将其与那些可能在近距离和中距离转向电动汽车的人的当前加油行为进行比较。未来。该研究遵循两个阶段的研究方法。首先,进行了定性访谈(N = 24),以从行为模式,加油动机和条件方面确定加油行为。第二步涉及就条件,频率和临界水平对加油和充气行为进行定量比较。为此,对来自德国的汽车驾驶员进行了大规模问卷调查(N = 1021)。结果表明,加油或加注决定的条件仅部分不同。尽管财务方面对电子汽车用户而言起着次要的作用,但对于内燃机用户而言,计划和习惯就不那么重要了。两组在范围相关因素方面没有差异。特别地,对于燃料箱和电池来说,被认为是关键的填充水平是相同的。就行为模式而言,电动汽车用户倾向于及时为消耗的电量充电,而带有内燃机的车辆的用户通常空车行驶,然后将其完全注满油箱。只能确定两种行为的预测因素。尽管社会人口因素几乎没有作用,但社会经济和车辆利用率是最大的预测指标。在计划新的充电基础设施时,将结果纳入潜在用户的建模中。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号