...
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation Research Record >Geographically Stratified Importance Sampling for the Calibration of Aggregated Destination Choice Models for Trip Distribution
【24h】

Geographically Stratified Importance Sampling for the Calibration of Aggregated Destination Choice Models for Trip Distribution

机译:地理分层重要性抽样,用于校准出行分布的汇总目的地选择模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A key feature in estimating and applying destination choice models with aggregate alternatives is to sample a set of nonchosen traffic analysis zones (TAZs), plus the one a trip maker chose, to construct a destination choice set. Computational complexity is reduced because the choice set would be too large if all study area TAZs were included in the calibration. Commonly, two types of sampling strategies are applied to draw subsets of alternatives from the universal choice set. The first, and simplest, approach is to select randomly a subset of nonchosen alternatives with uniform selection probabilities and then add the chosen alternative if it is not otherwise included. The approach, however, is not an efficient sampling scheme because most alternatives for a given trip maker may have small choice probabilities. The second approach, stratified importance sampling, draws samples with unequal selection probabilities determined on the basis of preliminary estimates of choice probabilities for every alternative in the universal choice set. The stratified sampling method assigns different selection probabilities to alternatives in different strata. Simple random sampling is applied to draw alternatives in each stratum. However, it is unclear how to divide the study area so that destination TAZs may be sampled effectively. The process of and findings from implementing a stratified sampling strategy in selecting alternative TAZs for calibrating aggregate destination choice models in a geographic information system (GIS) environment are described. In this stratified sampling analysis, stratum regions varied by spatial location and employment size in the adjacent area were defined for each study area TAZ. The sam-pling strategy is more effective than simple random sampling in regard to maximum log likelihood and goodness-of-fit values.
机译:估计和应用带有总体备选方案的目的地选择模型的一个关键功能是对一组未选择的交通分析区域(TAZ)进行抽样,再加上旅行制造者选择的一组,以构建目的地选择集合。减少了计算复杂性,因为如果将所有研究区域TAZ都包括在校准中,选择集将太大。通常,使用两种类型的抽样策略从通用选择集中抽取备选方案的子集。第一种也是最简单的方法是随机选择具有统一选择概率的未选择备选方案的子集,然后在未另外包括的情况下添加选定的备选方案。但是,该方法不是有效的采样方案,因为给定旅行社的大多数替代方案选择概率都较小。第二种方法是分层重要性抽样,它根据通用选择集中每个备选方案的选择概率的初步估计得出的选择概率不相等的样本。分层抽样方法将不同的选择概率分配给不同层次的替代方案。应用简单随机抽样在每个层次中绘制替代方案。但是,尚不清楚如何划分研究区域,以便可以有效地采样目标TAZ。描述了在选择替代TAZ来校准地理信息系统(GIS)环境中的总体目的地选择模型时,实施分层抽样策略的过程和发现。在此分层抽样分析中,为每个研究区域TAZ定义了随空间位置和相邻区域就业规模而变化的地层区域。就最大对数似然和拟合优度而言,采样策略比简单随机抽样更为有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号