...
首页> 外文期刊>Transportation planning and technology >Performance comparison between pedestrian push-button and pre-timed pedestrian crossings at midblock: a Korean case study
【24h】

Performance comparison between pedestrian push-button and pre-timed pedestrian crossings at midblock: a Korean case study

机译:韩国中部案例研究中街区行人按钮与预定行人过路处的性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Walking has been highlighted as an independent transportation mode as well as an access/egress mode to/from public transit to encourage the use of more sustainable transport systems. However, walking does not seem to have priority over other transportation modes, especially in areas where various modes of movement are in conflict. The pedestrian push-button system seems to be a solution to distribute the right of way. The focus of this study is on the performance issue of the pedestrian push-button. Specifically, this study deals with issues related to mid-block crossings and attempts to answer two questions: whose waiting time is longer at pre-timed and push-button crossings, pedestrians, or vehicles? and which system - pre-timed or push-button - is better in terms of total waiting time? According to our simulation analyses, if the pedestrian flow rate is less than 120, 85, and 70 ped/h for two-, three-, and four-lane roads, respectively, the push-button system is recommended.
机译:步行已被强调为一种独立的交通方式,也是往返公共交通的进出方式,以鼓励使用更可持续的交通系统。但是,步行似乎并不比其他交通方式优先,尤其是在各种交通方式相互冲突的地区。行人按钮系统似乎是分配通行权的解决方案。这项研究的重点是行人按钮的性能问题。具体而言,这项研究处理的是与中间路口过境有关的问题,并试图回答两个问题:谁在预定时和按钮式过境点,行人或车辆上的等待时间更长?在总等待时间方面,哪种系统(预定时或按钮式)更好?根据我们的仿真分析,如果两车道,三车道和四车道的行人流量分别小于120、85和70 ped / h,则建议使用按钮系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号