首页> 外文期刊>Transport policy >Environmentally sustainable urban transportation—comparative analysis of local emission mitigation strategies vis-a-vis GHG mitigation strategies
【24h】

Environmentally sustainable urban transportation—comparative analysis of local emission mitigation strategies vis-a-vis GHG mitigation strategies

机译:环境可持续的城市交通-相对于温室气体减排战略的地方减排战略的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study presents the comparison between global emission mitigation strategies (GEMS) and local emission mitigation strategies (LEMS) and their potential in controlling the non-target pollutants/emissions in concurrence with their economic performance. Comparative analysis revealed that strategies targeted at the mitigation of local pollution like total suspended particulate matter (TSP) and hydrocarbons (HC) also shows greater potential in reducing carbon dioxide (CO_2) emissions (as non-target emission). In GEMS, 20% CO_2 reduction resulted in 14.9% reduction in TSP emission. In LEMS with a 20% TSP reduction, CO_2 emission reduction was found to be 15.2%. TSP mitigation strategy not only performed well with non-target global emission but also within local emissions with SO_x reduction much higher than that of target pollutant (TSP itself). The HC mitigation strategy was found to be under-performing with most of the non-target pollutants lying far below the target pollutant reduction. The total cost of transportation is found to be in a similar and smaller band across all strategies (both GEMS and LEMS). The HC mitigation strategy resulted in the least cost followed by the CO_2 and TSP strategies. TSP strategy of emission reduction while planning the transportation system for a longer period was found more effective than GHG mitigation strategy. Therefore, employing local pollutant mitigation strategies in transportation planning would also cater for the needs of GHG mitigation, which is a key factor in attracting international funding organizations to invest in transport infrastructure development in developing countries. It would also provide equal consensus from local policy makers, environmental activist and also global actors. This presents a base for the argument that the transportation projects need to be looked at in pollution mitigation approach rather than the GHG mitigation approach,
机译:这项研究提出了全球减排战略(GEMS)和局部减排战略(LEMS)之间的比较,以及它们在控制非目标污染物/排放方面的潜力以及其经济绩效。对比分析显示,针对减轻局部污染(如总悬浮颗粒物(TSP)和碳氢化合物(HC))的策略在减少二氧化碳(CO_2)排放(作为非目标排放)方面也显示出更大的潜力。在GEMS中,减少20%的CO_2可使TSP排放减少14.9%。在TSP降低20%的LEMS中,发现CO_2排放降低了15.2%。 TSP缓解策略不仅在非目标全球排放方面表现良好,而且在局部排放范围内的SO_x降低远高于目标污染物(TSP本身)。发现HC缓解策略的效果不佳,大多数非目标污染物远低于目标污染物减少量。在所有策略(GEMS和LEMS)中,发现总的运输成本处于相似且较小的范围内。 HC缓解策略导致成本最低,其次是CO_2和TSP策略。人们发现,在规划较长时间的运输系统的同时,TSP减排策略比温室气体减排策略更有效。因此,在交通运输规划中采用当地污染物减排策略也将满足温室气体减排的需求,这是吸引国际资助组织投资于发展中国家交通基础设施发展的关键因素。它还将在地方政策制定者,环境活动家以及全球参与者之间达成平等共识。这为以下论点提供了依据:需要以减轻污染的方法而不是减少温室气体的方法来研究运输项目,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号