首页> 外文期刊>Transport policy >Car-less or car-free? Socioeconomic and mobility differences among zero-car households
【24h】

Car-less or car-free? Socioeconomic and mobility differences among zero-car households

机译:无车还是无车?零车家庭之间的社会经济和流动性差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Transportation professionals have long identified the important division between choice and constraint in modal decision-making. However, while heterogeneity within some modal groups such as transit riders is well documented, intragroup differences in other groups have been largely ignored. In particular, significant heterogeneity exists among zero-car households, who may not own a car due to choice (car-free) or constraint (car-less). Recognition of intragroup heterogeneity among zero-car households yields policy implications as cities consider where to invest their ever more precious and more limited transportation resources. Using activity diary data from the 2012 California Household Travel Survey, I investigate two research questions: first, how do car-less households compare to car-free households in terms of both their socioeconomic characteristics and their relative share of zero-car households? Second, how do motivations behind not owning a car translate into mobility differences - including daily trip counts and miles traveled? I find that, contrary to media reports that the number of car-free households that is, households that choose not to own a car is "booming", 79 percent of zero-car households do not own a car because of economic or physical constraints. Car-less households in many ways mirror the captive transit population, in that they have significantly lower household incomes, lower educational attainments, and are disproportionately non-white compared to car-free households. Observed socioeconomic variations translate into mobility differences, with car-free travelers taking more trips and traveling more miles per day. Policy makers should consider extending access to carshare services, which are positively associated with more trips and miles traveled among both car-free and car-less households.
机译:运输专业人员早就确定了模式决策中选择与约束之间的重要区别。但是,尽管有充分的资料证明了某些模式组(例如过境骑乘者)中的异质性,但其他组中的组内差异却被大大忽略了。特别是零汽车家庭之间存在很大的异质性,由于选择(无汽车)或约束(无汽车)可能没有汽车。随着城市考虑在何处投资其越来越宝贵和更有限的交通资源,零汽车家庭之间群体内部异质性的认识产生了政策含义。使用2012年加州家庭旅行调查的活动日志数据,我调查了两个研究问题:首先,无车家庭与无车家庭在社会经济特征和零车家庭的相对份额方面如何比较?第二,不拥有汽车背后的动机如何转化为出行方式的差异-包括每日旅行次数和行驶里程?我发现,与媒体报道相反,无车家庭的数量正在增加,因为选择不拥有汽车的家庭正在“蓬勃发展”,由于经济或物质限制,零汽车家庭中有79%的人不拥有汽车。与无车家庭相比,无车家庭在许多方面都反映了俘虏过境人口,因为他们的家庭收入大大降低,受教育程度较低,而且非白人非白人。观察到的社会经济差异转化为出行方式的差异,无车旅行者每天出行次数更多,行驶里程更多。政策制定者应考虑扩大获得汽车共享服务的机会,这与无车和无车家庭的出行次数和行驶里程成正比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号