...
首页> 外文期刊>Transnational environmental law >A Comparative Analysis of Accountability Mechanisms for Ecosystem Services Markets in the United States and the European Union
【24h】

A Comparative Analysis of Accountability Mechanisms for Ecosystem Services Markets in the United States and the European Union

机译:美国和欧盟生态系统服务市场问责机制的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Markets in ecosystem services have the potential to provide financial incentives to protect the environment either in lieu of or in addition to more traditional regulatory programmes. If these markets function properly, they can provide enhanced levels of environmental quality or more efficient mechanisms for protecting natural resources that provide vital services to humans. The theoretical benefits of ecosystem services markets may be undercut, however, if care is not taken in creating the legal infrastructure that supports trading to ensure that trades actually provide the promised environmental benefits. This article identifies five essential pillars of an ecosystem services market regime that are necessary to provide operational accountability safeguards. These include financial safeguards, verifiable performance standards, transparency and public participation standards, regulatory oversight mechanisms, and rule of law safeguards. The article assesses whether the laws of the United States (US) and European Union (EU) are well designed to provide such accountability. It concludes that despite recognition of the risk of market manipulation and outright fraud, regulators in the US and the EU to date have responded to these risks largely in an ad hoc and incomplete fashion, rather than embedding the mechanisms for operational accountability discussed in this article into the regulatory framework that governs ecosystem services trading markets.
机译:生态系统服务市场有可能提供资金激励来保护环境,以替代或更传统的监管计划。如果这些市场正常运行,它们可以提供更高水平的环境质量,或者提供更有效的机制来保护向人类提供重要服务的自然资源。但是,如果不注意创建支持交易的法律基础设施以确保交易实际提供承诺的环境收益,则生态系统服务市场的理论收益可能会被削弱。本文确定了生态系统服务市场体系的五个基本支柱,它们是提供运营问责保障的必要条件。这些措施包括财务保障措施,可验证的绩效标准,透明度和公众参与标准,监管监督机制以及法治保障措施。本文评估了美国(US)和欧盟(EU)的法律是否设计得很好以提供这种责任。结论是,尽管认识到市场操纵和彻底欺诈的风险,但迄今为止,美国和欧盟的监管机构在很大程度上以临时性和不完全的方式应对了这些风险,而不是嵌入本文讨论的运营问责机制纳入管理生态系统服务交易市场的监管框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号