...
首页> 外文期刊>Transnational environmental law >To Free or Not to Free? State Obligations and the Rescue and Release of Marine Mammals: A Case Study of 'Morgan the Orca'
【24h】

To Free or Not to Free? State Obligations and the Rescue and Release of Marine Mammals: A Case Study of 'Morgan the Orca'

机译:是免费还是不免费?国家义务与海洋哺乳动物的营救与释放:以“逆戟鲸”为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Wild animals periodically encounter difficulties or suffer injuries that require human intervention and assistance. The natural assumption is that a surviving animal will, where viable, be released back to the wild. But is there a formal legal obligation for a rescuer to do so? This question arose recently in the context of 'Morgan', a female killer whale rescued in poor health in Dutch waters. Morgan was successfully restored to full health, but the Dutch authorities subsequently declined to repatriate her to the wild and, controversially, transferred her to a zoological facility in Spain. This article examines the largely unexplored legal obligations incumbent upon the Netherlands in respect of rehabilitated cetaceans, in the process exposing certain problems of clarity and consistency within the present regulatory framework. By necessary implication, this article identifies emerging issues of interpretation posed by the Morgan saga, illustrating the tensions between animal welfare and nature conservation-especially in the transboundary context - and concluding firmly that the Dutch authorities erred legally in making their final decision.
机译:野生动物会定期遇到困难或遭受需要人工干预和协助的伤害。自然的假设是,存活的动物将在可行的情况下被放回野外。但是,救援人员是否有正式的法律义务?这个问题最近在“摩根”(Morgan)的背景下出现了,这是一只在荷兰水域因健康欠佳而获救的雌性虎鲸。摩根成功地恢复了健康,但荷兰当局随后拒绝将她遣返野外,有争议的是,将其转移到西班牙的动物园。本文研究了在恢复鲸类鲸鱼方面荷兰应承担的未开发的法律义务,在此过程中,人们暴露了当前监管框架内的某些清晰性和一致性问题。通过必要的暗示,本文确定了由摩根传奇引起的新出现的解释问题,阐明了动物福利与自然保护之间的紧张关系,尤其是在越境情况下,并坚决认为荷兰当局在做出最终决定时存在法律上的错误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号