...
【24h】

LETTER

机译:

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I am writing in reply to Albert Isaacs' letter (TA July 2008 P222) in which he criticises my article (TA March 2008) on several specific points which I hope to address here. Correct. I did not claim to review fare systems of Australia, it was specifically about Sydney, and in my view, although good systems, Melbourne's, Adelaide's and Perth's systems were not of great importance as examples. They are good examples, but not excellent examples as the HVV (In Hamburg) and the ZW (in Zurich) are. The reason I focussed on TransLink as it applies to Brisbane is that it is a recent application, taking aImost the exact form proposed for Sydney in the 1974 Sydney Area Transport Study. It also resulted in an immediate boost in patronage,and an even greater boost in revenue.lt is a fresh, contemporary example of a well executed fare reform agenda.
机译:我写这封信是为了回应艾伯特·艾萨克斯(Albert Isaacs)的来信(TA 2008年7月,P222),他在我的文章(TA 2008年3月,TA)上批评了我希望在这里解决的几个具体问题。正确。我并没有声称要审查澳大利亚的票价系统,特别是关于悉尼的票价系统,我认为,尽管良好的系统(例如墨尔本,阿德莱德和珀斯的系统)并不是很重要。它们是很好的例子,但不是HVV(在汉堡)和ZW(在苏黎世)的出色例子。我之所以将注意力集中在应用于布里斯班的TransLink上,是因为它是最近的应用,采用了1974年《悉尼地区交通研究》中为悉尼提议的最确切的形式。这也导致了乘客量的立即增加,甚至收入的更大增加。这是票价改革议程得到很好执行的一个现代例子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号