首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >Applicability of WEPP Sediment Transport Equation to Steep Slopes
【24h】

Applicability of WEPP Sediment Transport Equation to Steep Slopes

机译:WEPP泥沙输移方程对陡坡的适用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study was carried out to evaluate the transport capacity equations of the Yalin equation and the WEPP model for steep slopes, and to recommend the best-fitting exponent value of shear stress in the WEPP transport capacity equation. The transport capacity was measured in a 5 m long, 0.4 m wide hydraulic flume, and the diameter of test sediment varied from 20 to 2000 � m with a median diameter of 280 � m. Flow discharge ranged from 0.625 � 10 -3 to 5 � 10 -3 m 2 s -1 , and slope gradient ranged from 8.8% to 46.6%. An averaged dimensionless critical shear stress of 0.052 was used for T c calculation in the Yalin equation. The relationship between transport coefficient K t and shear stress was graphically determined for the transport capacity equation of the WEPP model. The transport capacities predicted by the Yalin equation and the WEPP model were compared with the measured T c to qualify their suitability on steep slopes. The results showed that the Yalin equation overestimated the measured T c by 109%. The error increased as a power function of shear stress (r 2 = 0.97). The transport capacity of the WEPP model underestimated the measured T c by 65%. The absolute error increased as a linear function of shear stress (r 2 = 0.91). Paired t-tests showed that the transport capacities calculated using the Yalin and WEPP equations were different significantly from measured T c at the 0.05 level. Sediment transport coefficient K t , calculated with the WEPP equation using the measured T c of this study, varied with shear stress. However, K t converged to a steady value of 0.053 when the best-fitting exponent of 2 for shear stress was used (r 2 = 0.98). Thus, K t t 2 is considered when estimating T c for steep slopes. More studies are needed to further evaluate the WEPP T c equation as well as this new equation using various soils on steep slopes.
机译:进行了这项研究,以评估Yalin方程和WEPP模型在陡坡上的传输能力方程,并在WEPP传输能力方程中推荐剪应力的最佳拟合指数值。输送能力是在5 m长,0.4 m宽的液压水槽中测量的,测试沉积物的直径从20到2000 m不等,中位直径为280 m。流量排放范围从0.625×10 -3到5×10 -3 m 2 s -1,斜率范围从8.8%到46.6%。在Yalin方程中,平均无因次临界剪切应力0.052用于T c的计算。通过图形确定了WEPP模型的输运能力方程,确定了输运系数K t和切应力之间的关系。将Yalin方程和WEPP模型预测的运输能力与测得的T c进行比较,以证明其在陡坡上的适用性。结果表明,Yalin方程高估了测得的T c 109%。误差作为切应力的幂函数增加(r 2 = 0.97)。 WEPP模型的运输能力将测得的T c低估了65%。绝对误差随切应力的线性函数增加(r 2 = 0.91)。配对t检验显示,使用Yalin和WEPP方程计算的运输能力与0.05水平下测得的T c显着不同。利用WEPP公式使用本研究的测得的T c计算出的泥沙输运系数K t随剪切应力而变化。但是,当使用剪应力的最佳拟合指数2时,K t收敛至0.053的稳定值(r 2 = 0.98)。因此,当估计陡坡的T c时考虑了K t t 2。需要更多的研究来进一步评估WEPP T c方程以及使用陡坡上的各种土壤的新方程。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transactions of the ASABE》 |2008年第5期|p.1675-1681|共7页
  • 作者单位

    The authors are Guang-hui Zhang, Professor, and Bao-yuan Liu, Professor, State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, and School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China;

    and Xun-chang Zhang, ASABE Member, Hydrologist, USDA-ARS Grazinglands Research Laboratory, El Reno, Oklahoma. Corresponding author: Guang-hui Zhang, State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, and School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China;

    phone: 86-10-58807454-1534;

    fax: 86-10-58806955;

    e-mail: ghzhang@bnu.edu.cn.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Sediment transport capacity, Soil erosion, Steep slopes, WEPP model, Yalin equation;

    机译:泥沙输送能力;土壤侵蚀;陡坡;WEPP模型;亚林方程;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号