首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >Methane Emissions from Manure Storages
【24h】

Methane Emissions from Manure Storages

机译:粪便中甲烷排放量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objectives of this study were to measure methane emissions from liquid manure stored on two farms (farm A and farm B) in eastern Canada and to evaluate the effect of various mitigation strategies on methane emissions. Manure from the two farms was kept at 10�C and 20�C for a 370-day period in storage pilots. The temperature profile in the storage tanks of both farms was also monitored during the experimental period. Manure from farm B (manure B) emitted methane soon after it was loaded to the storage pilots at 10�C and 20�C. It produced twice as much methane at 20�C as at 10�C. Frequent removal in the summer would significantly reduce methane emissions from manure stored on farm B, since an average manure temperature of 22�C was measured during the summer storage period. Manure from farm A (manure A) produced 3% and 54% of the methane emitted by manure B at 10�C and 20�C, respectively, over the 370-day monitoring period. Additionally, manure A produced methane after a lag phase of about 250 days at 20�C, which, on most farms, is longer than the storage period between land applications. Methane production from manure stored on farm A should then be minimal. Results were used to simulate the impact of mitigation practices on methane production from the full-scale storage structures on both farms. Increasing manure removal from 2 to 3 times a year and leaving the cows outside during summer nights decreased methane emissions by averages of 9% and 12%, respectively. Reducing the depth of residual manure left in the tank after land application from 60 to 30 cm reduced methane emissions by an average of 26%. The manure remaining in the storage structure becomes an important source of adapted inoculum that can readily produce methane. In every scenario, manure A produced about 3% of the methane emitted by manure B per kg of milk produced. The important difference between the two farms shows the large error that would arise from estimating methane production using a single emission factor for all farms within a region.
机译:这项研究的目的是测量加拿大东部两个农场(农场A和农场B)存储的液态粪便中的甲烷排放,并评估各种缓解策略对甲烷排放的影响。这两个农场的粪便在存储试点中分别在10°C和20°C下保存了370天。在实验期间,还监控了两个农场的储罐中的温度曲线。农场B的粪便(粪便B)在将甲烷装载到10°C和20°C的存储引燃器后不久便排放出甲烷。在20°C时产生的甲烷是10°C时的两倍。夏季频繁清除会大大减少农场B储存的粪便中的甲烷排放,因为在夏季储存期间测得的平均粪便温度为22°C。在370天的监测期内,农场A(肥料A)的粪便在10°C和20°C下分别产生了粪便B排放的甲烷的3%和54%。此外,粪便A在20°C约250天的滞后阶段后产生甲烷,在大多数农场中,这比土地施用之间的储存期更长。这样,从农场A储存的粪便产生的甲烷就应该最少。结果被用来模拟缓解措施对两个农场的大规模存储结构中甲烷生产的影响。每年将粪便清除量从2次增加到3次,并在夏季夜晚将奶牛放到外面,分别平均减少了9%和12%的甲烷排放。将土地施用后残留在储罐中的残留肥料深度从60厘米减少到30厘米,可将甲烷排放量平均减少26%。残留在存储结构中的肥料成为可轻易产生甲烷的适应接种物的重要来源。在每种情况下,每公斤生产的牛奶中,粪便A产生的粪便B排放的甲烷约占3%。这两个农场之间的重要区别表明,对于一个区域内的所有农场,使用单一排放因子估算甲烷产量将产生很大的误差。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transactions of the ASABE》 |2008年第5期|p.1775-1781|共7页
  • 作者单位

    The authors are Daniel I. Massé, ASABE Member, Researcher, LucieMasse, ASABE Member, Researcher, Stéphanie Claveau, GraduateStudent, Chaouki Benchaar, Researcher, Agriculture and Agri‐FoodCanada, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada;

    and Olivier Thomas, Professor,Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada. Correspondingauthor: Daniel I. Massé, Agriculture and Agri‐Food Canada, P.O. Box 90,STN‐Lennoxville, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, J1M 1Z3;

    phone:819‐565‐9171;

    fax: 819‐564‐5507;

    e‐mail: massed@agr.gc.ca.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Dairy manure, Greenhouse gas emissions, Manure storage, Methane, Mitigation practices;

    机译:奶牛粪便;温室气体排放;粪便储存;甲烷;缓解措施;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号