首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the American nuclear society >Rethinking Nuclear Emergency Planning, Preparations, and Response
【24h】

Rethinking Nuclear Emergency Planning, Preparations, and Response

机译:重新思考核应急计划,准备和响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The recent disaster involving the Fukushima nuclear complex is a powerful reminder, but only one among many, that it is time to revisit emergency planning for nuclear power plant accidents. Much has been learned since the 1980 planning regulations were put into place, and many new technological resources are now available. There is a clear need for more flexible and adaptive approaches, in both emergency planning and emergency response. Use of a living risk framework can help to ensure that an appropriate range of accident scenarios is considered in emergency planning, that critical resources are accessible and critical information is gathered, and that emergency plans are kept open to critical discussion and improvement. In short, it is time for the nuclear industry and its regulators to move beyond the culture of safety they have nurtured, to achieve a culture of protection.
机译:最近涉及福岛核电站的灾难有力地提醒了我们,但在众多灾难中,只有一个提醒是,现在该重新审视核电站事故的应急计划了。自从1980年制定计划法规以来,已经学到了很多东西,现在有许多新的技术资源可供使用。在应急计划和应急响应中,显然都需要更灵活和适应性更强的方法。使用生活风险框架可以帮助确保在紧急计划中考虑适当范围的事故场景,可以获取关键资源并收集关键信息,并且可以让紧急计划随时进行关键讨论和改进。简而言之,现在是时候让核工业及其监管者超越他们所培育的安全文化,实现保护文化了。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transactions of the American nuclear society》 |2013年第2期|1959-1961|共3页
  • 作者

    Rob Goble; Vick Bier;

  • 作者单位

    George Perkins Marsh Institute, Clark University, 16 Claremoni Street, Worcester, MA 01610;

    College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:01:31

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号