首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the American nuclear society >Differences in the Use of Nuclide x Vectors Demonstrated with an Analytic k_∞ Problem
【24h】

Differences in the Use of Nuclide x Vectors Demonstrated with an Analytic k_∞ Problem

机译:解析k_∞问题展示的核素x向量的使用差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper came about from the observation that MCNP's KSEN (a Monte Carlo code) and SENSMG/PARTISN (a deterministic code) computed very different sensitivities of k_∞ to the same input nuclide fission x vectors. This paper shows that the differences are due to the way each code uses the nuclide fission x vectors.None of the differences arise if the test material has only one nuclide or if PARTISN uses a fission x matrix. The differences may also be masked if different nuclear data are used in the comparison, such as "continuous energy" vs. multigroup. Some combination of these probably explains why previous comparisons of Monte Carlo and deterministic sensitivities to x did not seem to find this effect.
机译:本文是基于以下观察得出的:MCNP的KSEN(蒙特卡洛代码)和SENSMG / PARTISN(确定性代码)对相同的输入核素裂变x向量计算出k_∞的灵敏度差异非常大。本文表明,差异是由于每个代码使用核素裂变x向量的方式引起的。如果测试材料仅具有一个核素或PARTISN使用裂变x矩阵,则不会出现差异。如果在比较中使用了不同的核数据,例如“连续能量”与多组数据,则差异也可能被掩盖。这些的某种组合可能可以解释为什么以前的蒙特卡洛比较和对x的确定性敏感性似乎没有发现这种效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号