首页> 外文期刊>Traffic engineering & control >Area Travel Plans V's Local Travel Plans
【24h】

Area Travel Plans V's Local Travel Plans

机译:区域旅行计划V的本地旅行计划

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper reviews the efficiency and cost implications of Area Travel Plans (ATP's) relative to site-specific Travel Plans (TP's) from the perspective of the network users and travel planners. It is seen that the implementation of ATP's may decrease the potential for development planning related traffic 'rebound'. Rebound itself is characterized by an increase in demand incurred by indirect price benefits - an obvious example being increased fuel efficiency in cars. The present example identifies how such effects can potentially manifest in the development planning process. In particular it is shown that a TP results in a reduced generalised cost of travel and so offers positive externalities to all members of the surrounding community - not just those whom the policies are intended to directly affect - and consequently leaves individuals facing a new cost structure for alternative modes of transport. As a result, rebound may occur through mode switching behaviour (ie from bus to car) and/or an increased number of trips. Investigation of the effects of implementing two alternative, though potentially complementary TDM interventions namely (ⅰ) 'soft factor' policies which are intended to instigate behavioural change and (ⅱ) 'hard factor' policies which impose constraints on car use, are conducted using a graphical supply and demand analysis. This diagrammatic exposition coupled with some consideration of the socio-psychological benefits provides a compelling argument for further application of ATP's by the planning community.
机译:本文从网络用户和旅行计划者的角度回顾了区域旅行计划(ATP)相对于特定地点旅行计划(TP)的效率和成本影响。可以看出,ATP的实施可能会减少与发展规划相关的交通“反弹”的可能性。回弹本身的特点是间接价格优势导致需求增加-一个明显的例子是汽车燃油效率的提高。本示例确定了这种影响如何在开发计划过程中潜在地体现出来。特别是,TP显示出降低了总体旅行成本,因此为周围社区的所有成员(不仅是政策旨在直接影响的人们)提供了积极的外部性,因此使个人面临着新的成本结构替代运输方式。结果,通过模式切换行为(即,从公共汽车到汽车)和/或行程次数增加,可能会发生反弹。尽管实施了两种替代性TDM干预措施的效果研究,但这些干预措施可能是互补的,即(ⅰ)旨在刺激行为改变的“软因素”政策和(ⅱ)对汽车使用施加限制的“硬因素”政策,图形化的供需分析。这种图解说明加上对社会心理收益的某种考虑,为规划界进一步应用ATP提供了令人信服的论据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号