...
首页> 外文期刊>Trade Finance >A new player in commodity trade finance
【24h】

A new player in commodity trade finance

机译:大宗商品贸易融资的新参与者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Commodity finance, which involves lending to and servicing commodity producers, processors and traders either on an unsecured basis or secured by commodities and related receivables, has historically been a volatile market -just like commodity prices themselves. Numerous banks have entered and exited the market in recent decades. This was exacerbated by the financial crisis, and the economic downturn that followed, as this spurred a fresh wave of departures, largely by European banks. European banks dominated commodity finance in the pre-crisis period, largely because of the regulatory capital advantage they enjoyed over US banks. Most commodity counterparties are sub-investment grade given the impact of price volatility on their ratings and the fact that they are often located in emerging markets (and therefore constrained by sovereign ratings). At the time, US banks operated under Basel Ⅰ, which made it unattractive to lend to sub-investment grade credits as the relevant credit conversion factor was high. In contrast, European banks operated under Basel Ⅱ, which allowed for capital relief for specialised lending to sub-investment grade credits, and therefore gave them more flexibility to lend.
机译:从历史上看,涉及到以无抵押方式或以商品及相关应收款作抵押的商品生产者,加工者和贸易商并为其提供服务的商品融资一直是一个波动的市场,就像商品价格本身一样。近几十年来,许多银行已进入和退出市场。金融危机和随之而来的经济衰退加剧了这种情况,因为这引发了新一轮的离岸潮,主要是欧洲银行。在危机前的时期,欧洲银行在大宗商品融资中占主导地位,这在很大程度上是因为它们比美国银行具有监管资本优势。考虑到价格波动对其评级的影响以及它们通常位于新兴市场(因此受到主权评级的限制),大多数商品交易对手属于次级投资级别。当时,美国银行是在巴塞尔协议Ⅰ下运作的,由于相关的信贷转换系数很高,因此贷款给次级投资级别的信贷没有吸引力。相比之下,欧洲银行在《巴塞尔协议Ⅱ》下运作,允许对次级投资级别信贷的专门贷款进行资本减免,因此给予了他们更大的贷款灵活性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Trade Finance》 |2014年第5期|42-43|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号