首页> 外文期刊>Town planning review >European Integration and Rural Development: Actors, Institutions and Power
【24h】

European Integration and Rural Development: Actors, Institutions and Power

机译:欧洲一体化与农村发展:参与者,机构与权力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

European Integration and Rural Development responds to the evident and somewhat surprising lack of attention to rural policy and governance in the scholarship on the European integration project. While this omission perhaps reflects the knee-jerk presumption of the countryside as the perpetual periphery, this volume's contribution is pertinent considering that regional and rural policies, such as the LEADER+ under focus here, continue to represent the vast majority of expenditure under the EU budget. It is of course the theoretical lens which one chooses to provide focus that conditions what is most clearly visible and the first chapter provides a critical outline of the most prominent European integration theories. The focus on the rural in this volume means that this is essentially a study of the local-level implications and manifestations of European integration. The chosen multi-level governance (MLG) framework complemented by a structural-constructivist methodology applied to a comparative case study of the implementation of the LEADER+ programme in Finland and Germany serves this purpose well. This amalgamation of a largely structuralist theoretical framework with the more interpretative, epistemologically different methodology in the analysis of rural governance forms the second novel contribution that the volume makes and responds to many of the criticisms previously levelled at the popular MLG framework.
机译:欧洲一体化与农村发展是对欧洲一体化项目奖学金中对农村政策和治理缺乏关注的一种明显而令人惊讶的回应。尽管这一遗漏也许反映出农村是永远的边缘地带,但考虑到区域和农村政策(如此处重点关注的LEADER +)仍然代表了欧盟预算中的绝大部分支出,因此这一数额的贡献是相关的。当然,选择聚焦的理论视角是最清晰可见的条件,第一章提供了最杰出的欧洲一体化理论的重要概述。在这一卷中,对农村的关注意味着这实质上是对欧洲一体化对地方层面的影响和表现的研究。所选的多级治理(MLG)框架辅以结构-构造主义方法论,并应用于芬兰和德国实施LEADER +计划的比较案例研究中,很好地达到了这一目的。这种在很大程度上是结构主义的理论框架与在农村治理分析中更具解释性,认识论上不同的方法学的融合,构成了本书的第二个新颖贡献,它对以前在流行的MLG框架上提出的许多批评做出了回应。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Town planning review》 |2016年第1期|105107-108|共3页
  • 作者

    MERI JUNTTI;

  • 作者单位

    Middlesex University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:26:07

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号