首页> 外文期刊>Tourism management >Progress in dark tourism and thanatourism research: An uneasy relationship with heritage tourism
【24h】

Progress in dark tourism and thanatourism research: An uneasy relationship with heritage tourism

机译:黑暗旅游和旅游业研究的进展:与传统旅游的不安关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper reviews academic research into dark tourism and thanatourism over the 1996-2016 period. The aims of this paper are threefold. First, it reviews the evolution of the concepts of dark tourism and thanatourism, highlighting similarities and differences between them. Second it evaluates progress in 6 key themes and debates. These are: issues of the definition and scope of the concepts; ethical issues associated with such forms of tourism; the political and ideological dimensions of dark tourism and thanatourism; the nature of demand for places of death and suffering; the management of such places; and the methods of research used for investigating such tourism. Third, research gaps and issues that demand fuller scrutiny are identified. The paper argues that two decades of research have not convincingly demonstrated that dark tourism and thanatourism are distinct forms of tourism, and in many ways they appear to be little different from heritage tourism. (C) 2017 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:本文回顾了1996-2016年间有关黑暗旅游和旅游业的学术研究。本文的目的是三个方面。首先,它回顾了黑暗旅游和旅游业概念的演变,突出了它们之间的异同。其次,它评估了6个关键主题和辩论的进展。它们是:概念定义和范围问题;与这种旅游形式有关的道德问题;黑暗旅游和旅游业的政治和思想层面;对死亡和苦难场所的需求性质;这些地方的管理;以及用于调查此类旅游业的研究方法。第三,确定需要进一步审查的研究空白和问题。该论文认为,二十年的研究未能令人信服地证明,黑暗旅游和旅游业是独特的旅游形式,从许多方面看,它们与传统旅游几乎没有什么不同。 (C)2017作者。由Elsevier Ltd.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号