首页> 外文期刊>Tourism management >The secondary crisis communication of Occupy Central on Weibo: A response to Denis Tolkach
【24h】

The secondary crisis communication of Occupy Central on Weibo: A response to Denis Tolkach

机译:“占领中心”在微博上的次要危机通报:对丹尼斯·托尔卡奇的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This is a response to the rejoinder by Tolkach (2018) to Luo and Zhai's (2017) paper (“I will never go to Hong Kong again” How the secondary crisis communication of “Occupy Central” on Weibo shifted to a tourism boycott). The authors recognize Tolkach's suggestion on academic debates but hold different opinions to his arguments. Thus, further clarification is provided to Tolkach's two main concerns: the impact of Occupy Central on Hong Kong tourism and sentiment analysis of censored material. This response emphasizes that Luo and Zhai primarily discussed the secondary crisis communication and public emotions that arose in the Chinese social media over the events in Hong Kong, and not the events themselves. Additionally this rejoinder provides more information on Tourism between mainland China and Hong Kong, the environment of Chinese social media, and academic research progress in mainland China. It also advocates an “empathetic understanding” in cross-cultural academic dialogue.
机译:这是对托尔卡奇(2018)对罗和翟(2017)论文重新结合的回应(“我再也不会去香港了”,“占领中心”在微博上的次要危机沟通如何转变为抵制旅游业)。作者承认托尔卡奇(Tolkach)关于学术辩论的建议,但对他的论点持有不同意见。因此,进一步澄清了托尔卡赫(Tolkach)的两个主要问题:占领中心对香港旅游业的影响以及对审查资料的情绪分析。这一回应强调说,罗和翟主要讨论了中国社交媒体因香港事件而不是事件本身而引起的次要危机沟通和公众情绪。此外,此会议还提供了有关中国大陆与香港之间的旅游,中国社交媒体的环境以及中国大陆学术研究进展的更多信息。它还在跨文化的学术对话中提倡“善解人意”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号