...
首页> 外文期刊>Topics in cognitive science >Multidisciplinary Flux and Multiple Research Traditions Within Cognitive Science
【24h】

Multidisciplinary Flux and Multiple Research Traditions Within Cognitive Science

机译:认知科学中的多学科助焊剂和多重研究传统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Nunez et al. (2019) argue that cognitive science has failed either "to transition to a mature inter-disciplinary coherent field" (p. 782) or "to generate a successful [Lakatosian] research program" (p. 789). We argue that the former was never the intention of many early researchers within the field, while the latter is an inappropriate criterion by which to judge an entire discipline. However, we concur with Nunez et al. (2019) that the individual disciplinary balance within cognitive science has changed over time. Of particular concern is the fact that the use of computational methods appears to be on the wane.
机译:Nunez等人。 (2019年)认为认知科学已经失败了“转移到成熟间的间度相干领域”(第782页)或“生成成功的[Lakatosian]研究计划”(第789页)。我们认为,前者永远不会意图在该领域的许多早期研究人员,而后者是判断整个纪律的不当标准。但是,我们同意Nunez等人。 (2019)认知科学中的个人纪律平衡随着时间的推移而变化。特别关注的是,计算方法的使用似乎在衰落中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号