首页> 外文期刊>Tobacco control >Local Nordic tobacco interests collaborated with multinational companies to maintain a united front and undermine tobacco control policies
【24h】

Local Nordic tobacco interests collaborated with multinational companies to maintain a united front and undermine tobacco control policies

机译:北欧地方烟草利益集团与跨国公司合作,保持统一战线并破坏烟草控制政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective To analyse how local tobacco companies in the Nordic countries, individually and through National Manufacturers' Associations, cooperated with British American Tobacco and Philip Morris in denying the health hazards of smoking and undermining tobacco control. Methods Analysis of tobacco control policies in the Nordic countries and tobacco industry documents. Results Nordic countries were early adopters of tobacco control policies. The multinational tobacco companies recognised this fact and mobilised to oppose these policies, in part because of fear that they would set unfavourable precedents. Since at least 1972, the Nordic tobacco companies were well informed about and willing to participate in the multinational companies activities to obscure the health dangers of smoking and secondhand smoke and to oppose tobacco control policies. Cooperation between multinational companies, Nordic national manufacturer associations and local companies ensured a united front on smoking and health issues in the Nordic area that was consistent with the positions that the multinational companies were taking. This cooperation delayed smoke-free laws and undermined other tobacco control measures. Conclusions Local tobacco companies worked with multinational companies to undermine tobacco control in distant and small Nordic markets because of concern that pioneering policies initiated in Nordic countries would spread to bigger market areas. Claims by the local Nordic companies that they were not actively involved with the multinationals are not supported by the facts. These results also demonstrate that the industry appreciates the global importance of both positive and negative public health precedents in tobacco control.
机译:目的分析北欧国家的本地烟草公司如何单独或通过国家制造商协会与英美烟草公司和菲利普·莫里斯公司合作,共同否认吸烟对健康的危害并破坏烟草控制。方法分析北欧国家的烟草控制政策和烟草业文件。结果北欧国家是烟草控制政策的最早采用者。跨国烟草公司认识到这一事实,并动员起来反对这些政策,部分原因是担心它们会树立不利的先例。至少从1972年开始,北欧烟草公司就充分了解并愿意参加跨国公司的活动,以掩盖吸烟和二手烟对健康的危害并反对烟草控制政策。跨国公司,北欧国家制造商协会和本地公司之间的合作确保了北欧地区在吸烟和健康问题上的统一战线,这与跨国公司所采取的立场是一致的。这种合作推迟了无烟法律,破坏了其他烟草控制措施。结论由于担心在北欧国家发起的开拓性政策会传播到更大的市场区域,当地烟草公司与跨国公司合作破坏了遥远的北欧小市场的烟草控制。事实不支持当地北欧公司声称自己没有积极参与跨国公司的主张。这些结果还表明,该行业赞赏正面和负面的公共卫生先例在烟草控制中的全球重要性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Tobacco control》 |2013年第2期|144-144|共1页
  • 作者单位

    Social Insurance Institution of Finland, Helsinki;

    Center for Tobacco Control Research & Education, University of California, San Francisco, 530 Parnassus Avenue, Box 1390, San Francisco, CA 94143-1390,USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:34:20

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号