首页> 外文期刊>Tobacco control >Anti-tobacco policy in schools: upcoming preventive strategy or prevention myth? A review of 31 studies
【24h】

Anti-tobacco policy in schools: upcoming preventive strategy or prevention myth? A review of 31 studies

机译:学校的反烟草政策:即将到来的预防策略还是预防神话? 31项研究综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective To summarise the evidence on effectiveness of school anti-tobacco policies (exposure) in preventing tobacco use (outcome) among high school students. Data sources The search was conducted between 1 September and 30 November 2011 on six electronic databases with keywords: 'policy', 'ban', 'restriction' and 'environment' in combination with 'adolescent' or 'student', 'school' and 'smoking' in titles, abstracts or keywords. Restrictions were made to articles published in English. Study selection Studies were included if they targeted the relevant grades/age; reported at least one outcome measure of students' ever or current tobacco use; reported on the effects of exposure to policy separately from other interventions. Inclusion criteria were assessed independently by two of the coauthors. Of 2723 articles initially identified, 31 articles met the inclusion criteria (1.1%). Data extraction Independent multiple observers extracted the data following the GRADE system guidelines to classify the level of evidence in relation to the review objective. Data synthesis Studies were very heterogeneous in the definitions of exposure to school anti-tobacco policy and of tobacco use, adjustment for potential confounders and reporting of results, therefore summary quantitative measures of effect were not calculated. Qualitative summary statements were derived by reviewing the results reported in text and tables for distinct policy constructs. Evidence could be classified as low or very low, resting on cross-sectional studies with high risk of bias. Studies were rather consistent in indicating that comprehensive smoking bans, clear rules, strict policy enforcement, availability of education and prevention were associated with decreased smoking prevalence. Formally adopted and written policies, surveillance of students' behaviour and presence/severity of sanctions were not consistently associated to students' tobacco use. Conclusions The evidence concerning the effectiveness of a school policy alone in preventing youth tobacco use is weak and inconclusive. Experimental studies or observational studies with longitudinal design are warranted, employing dear definitions of policy components and careful control for confounding.
机译:目的总结学校反烟草政策(暴露)在预防高中生吸烟(结果)方面的有效性的证据。数据来源该搜索是在2011年9月1日至11月30日对六个电子数据库进行的,这些数据库的关键词为:“政策”,“禁令”,“限制”和“环境”,以及“青少年”或“学生”,“学校”和“标题,摘要或关键字中的“吸烟”。限制了以英文发表的文章。研究选择如果研究针对相关的年级/年龄,则将其包括在内;报告了至少一项关于学生曾经或当前使用烟草的成果指标;与其他干预措施分开报告了政策暴露的影响。纳入标准由两名合著者独立评估。最初确定的2723篇文章中,有31篇符合纳入标准(1.1%)。数据提取独立的多名观察员按照GRADE系统指南提取数据,以对与评审目标相关的证据等级进行分类。数据综合研究在学校反烟草政策的暴露和烟草使用,对潜在混杂因素的调整以及结果报告的定义上非常不同,因此没有计算总的量化效果。定性摘要声明是通过查看文本和表格中报告的不同政策构造的结果得出的。根据横断面研究,偏倚风险高,证据可分为低或极低。研究相当一致,表明全面的禁烟令,明确的规则,严格的政策执行,提供教育和预防措施与吸烟率下降有关。正式采用的书面政策,对学生行为的监控以及制裁的存在/严重程度与学生的烟草使用并不一致。结论关于仅一项学校政策在预防青少年吸烟方面的有效性的证据是薄弱且无定论的。必须进行具有纵向设计的实验研究或观察性研究,采用政策成分的明确定义并谨慎控制混淆。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Tobacco control》 |2014年第4期|295-301|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Centre for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Health Care District, Stockholm 17177, Sweden;

    Department of Translational Medicine, Avogadro University, Novara, Italy;

    Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden;

    Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden;

    Department of Translational Medicine, Avogadro University, Novara, Italy;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号