首页> 外文期刊>Tobacco control >Has FDA abandoned its efforts to make fake-cigar cigarettes comply with federal tobacco control laws that apply to cigarettes but not cigars?
【24h】

Has FDA abandoned its efforts to make fake-cigar cigarettes comply with federal tobacco control laws that apply to cigarettes but not cigars?

机译:FDA是否放弃了努力使假雪茄卷烟符合适用于香烟但不是雪茄的联邦烟草控制法律?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the USA, legal definitions of cigarettes and cigars are critical to tobacco control policy because federal, state and local laws typically tax and regulate cigarettes more strictly than cigars. In 2016, near the end of the Obama Administration, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sent warning letters to four filtered 'little cigar' manufacturers stating that their so-called 'cigars' were cigarettes and, therefore, subject to more stringent public health restrictions. Documents produced in response to a Freedom of Information Act request show that without explanation or public notice FDA has abandoned its prior determination that the manufacturers' 'little cigars' were actually cigarettes and, consequently, were violating the ban on flavoured cigarettes in the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (TCA). The documents also present the manufacturers' arguments against FDA's original position. However, those industry arguments are inconsistent with the research, other evidence and legal analysis indicating that filtered 'little cigars' meet the legal definition of cigarettes under the TCA and other similar federal, state and local definitions. To protect the public health, FDA must renew its efforts to ensure that these filtered 'little cigars' do not continue to evade compliance with the many important restrictions and requirements that apply to cigarettes but not cigars. Other government regulatory and tax-collection agencies with similar definitions need to follow suit.
机译:在美国,卷烟和雪茄的法律定义对烟草控制政策至关重要,因为联邦,州和地方法律通常比雪茄更严格纳税和调节香烟。 2016年,在奥巴马政府的终点附近,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)向四个过滤的“小雪茄”制造商发送了警告信,说明他们所谓的“雪茄”是香烟,因此受到更严格的公共卫生限制。根据信息法案的自由制作的文件表明,没有解释或公开通知FDA已经放弃了其先前的决定,制造商的“小雪茄”实际上是卷烟,因此,违反了家庭吸烟中的禁止味香烟预防和烟草控制法(TCA)。该文件还将制造商对FDA原始位置的论点展示。然而,这些行业论点与研究,其他证据和法律分析不一致,表明过滤的“小雪茄”符合TCA和其他类似联邦,国家和地方定义下的香烟的法律定义。为了保护公共卫生,FDA必须更新其努力,以确保这些过滤的“小雪茄”不要继续逃避遵守卷烟但不是雪茄的许多重要限制和要求。其他具有类似定义的政府监管和税收收集机构需要遵循诉讼。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号