首页> 外文期刊>Time >The Political Science Test
【24h】

The Political Science Test

机译:政治学考试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The 3 1/2-HR. Conference call brought together nearly two dozen of the nation's best minds on the subject of air quality—and many of them were steamed. As the scientists of the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, they are rarely overruled on their recommendations about how the government should react to the latest and best research on the dangers of dirty air. Seven months ago, they warned the EPA in a letter that unless it made at least modest reductions in the amount of airborne soot, thousands of Americans would die prematurely each year. But last December, epa Administrator Stephen Johnson, citing "the best available science," ignored their coun- sel. On the phone call last week, an exasperated Dr. James Crapo, professor of medicine at Denver's National Jewish Medical and Research Center, told his fellow scientists, "We need to write another letter and this time take a stronger stand."
机译:3 1 / 2-HR。电话会议汇聚了全国近二十个关于空气质量的最佳专家,其中许多人蒸蒸日上。作为环境保护局清洁空气科学咨询委员会的科学家,他们对政府应如何对有关污染空气危险的最新最佳研究做出反应的建议很少被否决。七个月前,他们在一封信中警告EPA,除非它至少适度减少空气中的烟尘含量,否则每年成千上万的美国人会过早死亡。但是去年12月,环保署行政长官斯蒂芬·约翰逊(Stephen Johnson)引用了“现有最佳科学”一词,无视他们的建议。上周在电话中,丹佛国家犹太医学研究中心的医学教授詹姆斯·克雷波(James Crapo)气愤地告诉他的科学家们,“我们需要再写一封信,这次要站得住脚。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号