...
首页> 外文期刊>Thin-Walled Structures >Comparative experimental study of hot-rolled and cold-formed rectangular hollow sections
【24h】

Comparative experimental study of hot-rolled and cold-formed rectangular hollow sections

机译:热轧和冷弯矩形空心型材的对比实验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Square and rectangular hollow sections are generally produced either by hot-rolling or cold-forming. Cross-sections of nominally similar geometries, but from the two different production routes may vary significantly in terms of their general material properties, geometric imperfections, residual stresses, corner geometry and material response and general structural behaviour and load-carrying capacity. In this paper, an experimental programme comprising tensile coupon tests on flat and corner material, measurements of geometric imperfections and residual stresses, stub column tests and simple and continuous beam tests is described. The results of the tests have been combined with other available test data on square and rectangular hollow sections and analysed. Enhancements in yield and ultimate strengths, beyond those quoted in the respective mill certificates, were observed in the corner regions of the cold-formed sections-these are caused by cold-working of the material during production, and predictive models have been proposed. Initial geometric imperfections were generally low in both the hot-rolled and cold-formed sections, with larger imperfections emerging towards the ends of the cold-formed members-these were attributed largely to the release of through thickness residual stresses, which were themselves quantified. The results of the stub column and simple bending tests were used to assess the current slenderness limits given in Eurocode 3, including the possible dependency on production route, whilst the results of the continuous beam tests were evaluated with reference to the assumptions typically made in plastic analysis and design. Current slenderness limits, assessed on the basis of bending tests, appear appropriate, though the Class 3 slenderness limit, assessed on the basis of compression tests, seems optimistic. Of the features investigated, strain hardening characteristics of the material were identified as being primarily responsible for the differences in structural behaviour between hot-rolled and cold-formed sections.
机译:方形和矩形中空型材通常通过热轧或冷成型生产。名义上相似的几何形状,但来自两种不同生产途径的横截面,在其总体材料性能,几何缺陷,残余应力,拐角几何形状和材料响应以及总体结构行为和承载能力方面,可能会有很大不同。在本文中,描述了一个实验程序,包括对平面和拐角材料的拉伸试样测试,几何缺陷和残余应力的测量,短柱测试以及简单而连续的梁测试。测试结果已与正方形和矩形空心截面上的其他可用测试数据相结合并进行了分析。在冷弯型材的拐角区域观察到了屈服强度和极限强度的提高,超出了相应轧机证书中的报价,这是由于材料在生产过程中的冷加工引起的,并提出了预测模型。在热轧和冷弯型材中,最初的几何缺陷通常都很低,而在冷弯型材的端部出现较大的缺陷,这些缺陷主要归因于厚度方向残余应力的释放,而残余应力本身是量化的。短柱的结果和简单的弯曲测试被用来评估欧洲规范3中当前的细长极限,包括可能对生产路线的依赖性,而连续梁测试的结果则参考了通常在塑料中做出的假设进行评估分析和设计。尽管根据压力测试评估的3类细长极限似乎是乐观的,但根据弯曲试验评估的当前细长极限似乎是合适的。在研究的特征中,材料的应变硬化特性被认为是造成热轧和冷弯型材结构行为差异的主要原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号