首页> 外文期刊>Theoretical Chemistry Accounts >Analysis of the metal–ligand bonds in [Mo(X)(NH2)3] (X = P, N, PO, and NO), [Mo(CO)5(NO)]+, and [Mo(CO)5(PO)]+
【24h】

Analysis of the metal–ligand bonds in [Mo(X)(NH2)3] (X = P, N, PO, and NO), [Mo(CO)5(NO)]+, and [Mo(CO)5(PO)]+

机译:[Mo(X)(NH2 )3 ](X = P,N,PO和NO),[Mo(CO)5 ( NO)] + 和[Mo(CO)5 (PO)] +

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Quantum chemical calculations at the DFT level have been carried out for model complexes [Mo(P)(NH2)3] (1), [Mo(N)(NH2)3] (2), [Mo(PO)(NH2)3] (3), [Mo(NO)(NH2)3] (4), [Mo(CO)5(PO)]+ (5), and [Mo(CO)5(NO)]+ (6). The equilibrium geometries and the vibration frequencies are in good agreement with experimental and previous theoretical results. The nature of the Mo–PO, Mo–NO, Mo–PO+, Mo–NO+, Mo–P, and Mo–N bond has been investigated by means of the AIM, NBO and EDA methods. The NBO and EDA data complement each other in the interpretation of the interatomic interactions while the numerical AIM results must be interpreted with caution. The terminal Mo–P and Mo–N bonds in 1 and 2 are clearly electron-sharing triple bonds. The terminal Mo–PO and Mo–NO bonds in 3 and 4 have also three bonding contributions from a σ and a degenerate π orbital where the σ components are more polarized toward the ligand end and the π orbitals are more polarized toward the metal end than in 1 and 2. The EDA calculations show that the π bonding contributions to the Mo–PO and Mo–NO bonds in 3 and 4 are much more important than the σ contributions while σ and π bonding have nearly equal strength in the terminal Mo–P and Mo–N bonds in 1 and 2. The total (NH2)3Mo–PO binding interactions are stronger than for (NH2)3Mo–P which is in agreement with the shorter Mo–PO bond. The calculated bond orders suggest that there are only (NH2)3Mo–PO and (NH2)3Mo–NO double bonds which comes from the larger polarization of the σ and π contributions but a closer inspection of the bonding shows that these bonds should also be considered as electron-sharing triple bonds. The bonding situation in the positively charged complexes [(CO)5Mo–(PO)]+ and [(CO)5Mo–(NO)]+ is best described in terms of (CO)5Mo → XO+ donation and (CO)5Mo ← XO+ backdonation (X = P, N) using the Dewar–Chatt–Duncanson model. The latter bonds are stronger and have a larger π character than the Mo-CO bonds.
机译:已对模型配合物[Mo(P)(NH2 )3 ](1),[Mo(N)(NH2 )3 < / sub>](2),[Mo(PO)(NH2 )3 ](3),[Mo(NO)(NH2 )3 ](4 ),[Mo(CO)5 (PO)] + (5)和[Mo(CO)5 (NO)] + (6)。平衡几何形状和振动频率与实验和先前的理论结果非常吻合。 Mo-PO,Mo-NO,Mo-PO + ,Mo-NO + ,Mo-P和Mo-N键的性质已通过AIM,NBO和EDA方法进行了研究。 NBO和EDA数据在解释原子间相互作用时是互补的,而数字AIM结果必须谨慎解释。 1和2中的末端Mo–P和Mo–N键显然是电子共享的三键。 3和4中的末端Mo-PO和Mo-NO键还具有σ和简并π轨道的三个键合贡献,其中σ组分比配体端更极化,而π轨道比金属端更极化。 EDA计算表明,在3和4中,对Mo-PO和Mo-NO键的π键贡献比σ贡献重要得多,而σ和π键在Mo–端的强度几乎相等。 P和Mo–N键分别位于1和2。总(NH2 )3 Mo-PO的键合相互作用强于(NH2 )3 Mo–P的键合与较短的Mo-PO键一致。计算得出的键序表明只有(NH2 )3 Mo-PO和(NH2 )3 Mo-NO双键来自于较大的极化。 σ和π的贡献,但对键的仔细检查表明,这些键也应被视为电子共享的三键。带正电的配合物[(CO)5 Mo–(PO)] + 和[(CO)5 Mo–(NO)] + 的键合情况为用Dewar–Chatt对(CO)5 Mo→XO + 捐赠和(CO)5 Mo←XO + 背捐赠(X = P,N)进行了最好的描述–邓肯森模型。后者的键比Mo-CO键更强,具有更大的π特性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号