首页> 外文期刊>The Washington Quarterly >How Dangerous Was Kargil? Nuclear Crises in Comparative Perspective
【24h】

How Dangerous Was Kargil? Nuclear Crises in Comparative Perspective

机译:卡吉尔有多危险?比较视角下的核危机

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Between May and June of 1999, India and Pakistan engaged in a higher-intensity military conflict than any other pair of nuclear-armed states had before or have since. Although it remained geographically contained, the Katgil War resulted in hundreds of casualties on both sides and saw frantic diplomatic intervention by the United States in an effort to de-escalate the conflict. It is therefore unsurprising that the Kargil War is commonly seen as one of the few occasions that the world has come close to nuclear war, and perhaps second only to the Cuban Missile Crisis in terms of the risk of nuclear escalation. In the years since, India and Pakistan have engaged in repeated skirmishes, crises, and periods of tension, with the two countries again coming into conflict in the spring of 2019 in response to a deadly attack on Indian military forces by the Pakistan-backed terrorist group Jaish-e-Mohammed.
机译:在1999年5月至6月期间,印度和巴基斯坦发生了比其他任何一对核武国家以前或之后的激烈军事冲突。尽管它在地理上仍然受到控制,但卡吉尔战争在双方造成了数百人伤亡,并看到美国为使冲突升级而进行了疯狂的外交干预。因此,毫不奇怪的是,卡吉尔战争通常被视为世界上接近核战争的少数情况之一,就核升级的风险而言,也许仅次于古巴导弹危机。此后的几年中,印度和巴基斯坦屡屡发生小规模冲突,危机和紧张局势,由于巴基斯坦支持的恐怖分子对印度军队的致命袭击,两国在2019年春季再次陷入冲突Jaish-e-Mohammed小组。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Washington Quarterly》 |2019年第2期|135-148|共14页
  • 作者

    Mark S. Bell; Julia Macdonald;

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota;

    Josef Korbel School of International Studies University of Denver;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号