...
首页> 外文期刊>The Washington Quarterly >On Creating the Conditions for Nuclear Disarmament: Past Lessons, Future Prospects
【24h】

On Creating the Conditions for Nuclear Disarmament: Past Lessons, Future Prospects

机译:关于创造核裁军的条件:过去的经验,未来的前景

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A t the center of the international policy debate about nuclear disarmament are some quite basic questions: What are the conditions that would enable the nuclear-armed states to safely disarm and then the world community to live safely in a post-nuclear world? Is it possible to create those conditions? If so, when? If not, what should be done? In surveying the history of the policy debate, it is clear that serious interest in these questions is at best episodic. Today, however, they are back in discussion— for a variety of reasons. One is the 2020 review conference of states parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The upcoming conference promises to be even more fractious than most of its predecessors, not least because it comes on the occasion of major questions about the durability of the existing international nuclear order. Another reason is the campaign for signature, ratification, and entry into force of the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), which has cast a bright light on the absence of any real answers in the treaty to the enduring challenges of disarmament. A third reason is the Trump administration's proposal for "a new disarmament discourse" focused on creating the conditions for nuclear disarmament. Dr. Christopher Ford, Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Nonproliferation, sketched out this proposal in April 2018 and subsequently called for creating a new international working group to identify and catalogue the necessary conditions.1 A fourth reason is the renewal of nuclear policy debate in the U.S. Congress driven in part by the Democratic Party leadership's call for a "reset" of nuclear policy with a strong disarmament focus and the impact of that debate in energizing the United States and wider NGO community.
机译:关于核裁军的国际政策辩论的中心是一些非常基本的问题:什么条件可以使核武国家安全解除武装,然后国际社会就可以在后核世界中安全生活?有可能创造这些条件吗?如果是这样,什么时候?如果没有,应该怎么办?在调查政策辩论的历史时,很明显,对这些问题的严重兴趣充其量是偶然的。但是,由于各种原因,今天它们又回到了讨论中。其中之一是《不扩散核武器条约》(NPT)2020年缔约国审议大会。即将召开的会议有望比大多数前任会议更加艰难,尤其是因为它是在对现有国际核秩序的持久性提出重大质疑之际召开的。另一个原因是争取签署,批准和生效《禁止核武器条约》(TPNW)的运动,这为该条约对裁军的持久挑战没有任何实际答案提供了亮点。第三个原因是特朗普政府关于“新裁军讨论”的提议,该提议着重于创造核裁军的条件。国际安全与不扩散事务助理国务卿克里斯托弗·福特博士于2018年4月草拟了该提案,随后呼吁建立一个新的国际工作组来确定和分类必要条件1.第四个原因是续签核政策美国国会的辩论部分是由于民主党领导人呼吁以强力裁军为重点的“重置”核政策,以及这场辩论在激发美国和更广泛的NGO社区的影响方面。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Washington Quarterly 》 |2019年第2期| 7-30| 共24页
  • 作者

    Brad Roberts;

  • 作者单位

    Center for Global Security Research at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号